Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11042146›Full record

ArticleGenome research2000

Chromosome evolution: the junction of mammalian chromosomes in the formation of mouse chromosome 10.

M T Pletcher, B A Roe, F Chen, T Do, A Do, E Malaj, R H Reeves

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Glucose-Sensing in the Reward System.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2017
    Review
  4. A novel SGLT is expressed in the human kidney.European journal of pharmacology · 2012
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M T PletcherDepartment of Physiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
B A Roe
F Chen
T Do
A Do
E Malaj
R H Reeves

Funding

OKLAHOMA UNIVERSITY GENOME CENTER - ADVANCED CENTER FORU54HG002153 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA NORMAN · PI ROE, BRUCE A · 1999 to 2003
$10.4M
UTILIZATION OF TRANSGENICS IN THE STUDY OF DOWN SYNDROMEP01HD024605 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI REEVES, ROGER H · 1989 to 2004
$8.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG-02153NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG002153NICHD NIH HHS HD-24605NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD024605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During evolution, chromosomes are rearranged and become fixed into new patterns in new species. The relatively conservative nature of this process supports predictions of the arrangement of ancestral mammalian chromosomes, but the basis for these rearrangements is unknown. Physical mapping of mouse chromosome 10 (MMU 10) previously identified a 380-kb region containing the junction of material represented in human on chromosomes 21 (HSA 21) and 22 (HSA 22) that occurred in the evolutionary lineage of the mouse. Here, acquisition of 275 kb of mouse genomic sequence from this region and comparative sequence analysis with HSA 21 and HSA 22 narrowed the junction from 380 kb to 18 kb. The minimal junction region on MMU 10 contains a variety of repeats, including an L32-like ribosomal element and low-copy sequences found on several mouse chromosomes and represented in the mouse EST database. Sequence level analysis of an interchromosomal rearrangement during evolution has not been reported previously.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhysical Chromosome MappingRecombination, GeneticAnimalsChromosomesCloning, MolecularContig MappingGene FrequencyGenomic LibraryHumansMiceMolecular Sequence DataOpen Reading FramesSequence Analysis, DNATranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID11042146
PMCPMC310982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.