SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Mifepristone for induction of labour.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- Morning versus evening induction of labour for improving outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Mifepristone for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Reducing stillbirths: interventions during labour.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2009Pooled it
- Intracervical prostaglandins for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- Oestrogens alone or with amniotomy for cervical ripening or induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001Pooled it
- Extra-amniotic prostaglandin for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001Pooled it
- Homoeopathy for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001Pooled it
- Amniotomy alone for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000Pooled it
- M1 Macrophages Are a Source of IL-1α: A Driver of Progesterone Metabolism and Myometrial Contraction.Cells · 2025Article
- Novel concepts on pregnancy clocks and alarms: redundancy and synergy in human parturition.Human reproduction update · 2016Review
- Genomics of preterm birth.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2015Review
- Demystifying animal models of adverse pregnancy outcomes: touching bench and bedside.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2013Article
- Progesterone receptor-A and -B have opposite effects on proinflammatory gene expression in human myometrial cells: implications for progesterone actions in human pregnancy and parturition.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2012Article
- Progestin treatment for the prevention of preterm birth.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2011Review
- Human labor is associated with reduced decidual cell expression of progesterone, but not glucocorticoid, receptors.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2010Article
- Morning versus evening induction of labour for improving outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe steroid hormone, progesterone, inhibits contractions of the uterus. Antiprogestins (including mifepristone) have been developed to antagonise the action of progesterone, and these have a recognised role in medical termination of early or mid-pregnancy. Animal studies have suggested that mifepristone may also have a role in inducing labour in late pregnancy.
objectivesTo determine the effects of mifepristone for third trimester cervical ripening or induction of labour. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and reference lists of relevant papers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Selection criteria included: (1) clinical trials comparing mifepristone used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction with placebo/no treatment or other labour induction methods; (2) random allocation to the treatment or control group; (3) adequate allocation concealment; (4) violations of allocated management not sufficient to materially affect conclusions; (5) clinically meaningful outcome measures reported; (6) data available for analysis according to the random allocation; (7) missing data insufficient to materially affect the conclusions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: This is one of a series of reviews of methods of cervical ripening and labour induction using standardised methodology. Data were extracted by the reviewer and, independently, by a colleague. MAIN
resultsSeven trials, that recruited 594 women, are included. All trials compared mifepristone with placebo, except for one that compared mifepristone with no treatment. Compared to placebo, mifepristone treated women were less likely to have an unfavourable cervix at 48 hours (relative risk [RR] 0.36, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.2-0.63) or 96 hours (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.23-0.66). Mifepristone treated women were more likely to have delivered within 48 and 96 hours of treatment than were placebo treated/no treatment women - 48 hours: RR 2.82, 95% CI 1.82-4.36; 96 hours: RR 3.40, 95% CI 1.96-5.92. Mifepristone treated women were less likely to undergo caesarean section (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.95). There is little information about fetal outcome, although there was no evidence that neonatal hypoglycaemia might be more common after exposure to mifepristone. Similarly, there is little information about maternal side-effects although some nausea and vomiting was reported in one trial. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThere is insufficient information available from clinical trials to support the use of mifepristone to induce labour. However, available data do show that mifepristone is better than placebo at ripening the cervix, and inducing labour. There is evidence of a possible reduction in the incidence of caesarean section following mifepristone treatment (compared to placebo) that would justify further trials. We found no trials that compared mifepristone with alternative methods of inducing labour e.g. prostaglandins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.