Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11034779›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Mifepristone for induction of labour.

J P Neilson

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Morning versus evening induction of labour for improving outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  2. Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  3. Mifepristone for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  4. Reducing stillbirths: interventions during labour.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2009
    Pooled it
  5. Intracervical prostaglandins for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Extra-amniotic prostaglandin for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001
    Pooled it
  8. Homoeopathy for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001
    Pooled it
  9. Amniotomy alone for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2000
    Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Genomics of preterm birth.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2015
    Review
  13. Demystifying animal models of adverse pregnancy outcomes: touching bench and bedside.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2013
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Progestin treatment for the prevention of preterm birth.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2011
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Morning versus evening induction of labour for improving outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

J P NeilsonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, L69 3BX. jneilson@liverpool.ac.uk
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe steroid hormone, progesterone, inhibits contractions of the uterus. Antiprogestins (including mifepristone) have been developed to antagonise the action of progesterone, and these have a recognised role in medical termination of early or mid-pregnancy. Animal studies have suggested that mifepristone may also have a role in inducing labour in late pregnancy.

objectivesTo determine the effects of mifepristone for third trimester cervical ripening or induction of labour. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and reference lists of relevant papers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Selection criteria included: (1) clinical trials comparing mifepristone used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction with placebo/no treatment or other labour induction methods; (2) random allocation to the treatment or control group; (3) adequate allocation concealment; (4) violations of allocated management not sufficient to materially affect conclusions; (5) clinically meaningful outcome measures reported; (6) data available for analysis according to the random allocation; (7) missing data insufficient to materially affect the conclusions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: This is one of a series of reviews of methods of cervical ripening and labour induction using standardised methodology. Data were extracted by the reviewer and, independently, by a colleague. MAIN

resultsSeven trials, that recruited 594 women, are included. All trials compared mifepristone with placebo, except for one that compared mifepristone with no treatment. Compared to placebo, mifepristone treated women were less likely to have an unfavourable cervix at 48 hours (relative risk [RR] 0.36, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.2-0.63) or 96 hours (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.23-0.66). Mifepristone treated women were more likely to have delivered within 48 and 96 hours of treatment than were placebo treated/no treatment women - 48 hours: RR 2.82, 95% CI 1.82-4.36; 96 hours: RR 3.40, 95% CI 1.96-5.92. Mifepristone treated women were less likely to undergo caesarean section (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.95). There is little information about fetal outcome, although there was no evidence that neonatal hypoglycaemia might be more common after exposure to mifepristone. Similarly, there is little information about maternal side-effects although some nausea and vomiting was reported in one trial. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThere is insufficient information available from clinical trials to support the use of mifepristone to induce labour. However, available data do show that mifepristone is better than placebo at ripening the cervix, and inducing labour. There is evidence of a possible reduction in the incidence of caesarean section following mifepristone treatment (compared to placebo) that would justify further trials. We found no trials that compared mifepristone with alternative methods of inducing labour e.g. prostaglandins.

Indexed as

MifepristoneOxytocicsClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansLabor, InducedPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, ThirdMifepristoneOxytocics

Identifiers

PMID11034779
OpenAlexW4248877448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.