Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11034775›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Vitamin E for Alzheimer's disease.

N Tabet, J Birks, Grimley Evans J

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Progress update: Pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer's disease.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2007
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Alpha-tocopherol: roles in prevention and therapy of human disease.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2005
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Antioxidant treatment in Alzheimer's disease: current state.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2003
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

N TabetOld Age Psychiatry, The Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK, SE5 8AZ. N.Tabet@iop.kcl.ac.uk
J Birks
Grimley Evans J
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Brighton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVitamin E is a dietary compound that functions as an antioxidant scavenging toxic free radicals. Evidence that free radicals may contribute to the pathological processes in Alzheimer's disease has led to interest in the use of vitamin E in the treatment of this disorder.

objectivesTo examine the effects of vitamin E treatment for people with Alzheimer's disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Dementia Group Register of Clinical Trials was searched with the following terms: vitamin E, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, alpha-tocopherol, cognitive impairment, cognitive function and controlled trials. The latest search was carried out in July 2000. SELECTION CRITERIA: All unconfounded, double blind, randomized trials in which treatment with vitamin E at any dose was compared with placebo for patients with Alzheimer's disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently applied the selection criteria an assessed study quality. One reviewer extracted and analysed the data. For each outcome measure data were sought on every patient randomized. Where such data were not available an analysis of patients who completed treatment was conducted. MAIN

resultsOnly one study was identified which met the inclusion criteria (Sano 1997). The primary outcome used in this study of 341 participants was survival time to the first of 4 endpoints, death, institutionalisation, loss of 2 out of 3 basic activities of daily living, or severe dementia, defined as a global Clinical Dementia Rating of 3. The investigators reported the total numbers in each group who reached the primary endpoint within two years for participants completing the study ("completers"). There appeared to be some benefit from vitamin E with fewer participants reaching endpoint - 58% (45/77) of completers compared with 74% (58/78) - a Peto odds ratio of 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.25 to 0.96. However, more participants taking vitamin E suffered a fall (12/77 compared with 4/78; odds ratio 3.07, 95% CI 1.09 to 8.62). It was not possible to interpret the reported results for specific endpoints or for secondary outcomes of cognition, dependence, behavioural disturbance and activities of daily living. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsThere is insufficient evidence of efficacy of vitamin E in the treatment of people with with Alzheimer's disease. The one published trial of acceptable methodology (Sano 1997) was restricted to patients with moderate disease, and the published results are difficult to interpret. There is sufficient evidence of possible benefit to justify further studies. There was an excess of falls in the vitamin E group compared with placebo which requires further evaluation.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVitamin EVitamin E

Identifiers

PMID11034775
OpenAlexW2281695020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.