SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Fluoride for treating postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Warm needle acupuncture in primary osteoporosis management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acupuncture in medicine : journal of the British Medical Acupuncture Society · 2018Pooled it
- Chinese herbal medicines for treating osteoporosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Exercise for preventing and treating osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Effects of treatment with fluoride on bone mineral density and fracture risk--a meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2008Pooled it
- Melatonin Supplementation Relieves Fluoride-Induced Bone Injury via Ion Homeostasis Disorder and PINK1/Parkin-Mediated Mitophagy.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Research progress of diabetic osteoporosis: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Osteoporosis treatment: current drugs and future developments.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- High Fluoride Ingestion Impairs Bone Fracture Healing by Attenuating M2 Macrophage Differentiation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treatments: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Chemical Aspects of Human and Environmental Overload with Fluorine.Chemical reviews · 2021Review
- The Fluoride Debate: The Pros and Cons of Fluoridation.Preventive nutrition and food science · 2018Review
- Gossypol Promotes Bone Formation in Ovariectomy-Induced Osteoporosis through Regulating Cell Apoptosis.BioMed research international · 2018Article
- Implementing informative priors for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using meta-regression and pseudo data.Statistics in medicine · 2016Article
- Tools in the assessment of sarcopenia.Calcified tissue international · 2013Review
- Osteogenic effects of D+beta-3,4-dihydroxyphenyl lactic acid (salvianic acid A, SAA) on osteoblasts and bone marrow stromal cells of intact and prednisone-treated rats.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2009Article
- Osteoporosis in the aging male: treatment options.Clinical interventions in aging · 2007Review
- Why do doctors use treatments that do not work?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the efficacy of fluoride therapy on bone loss, vertebral and non-vertebral fractures and side effects in postmenopausal women. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Medline, Current Contents and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Registry up to December 1998. SELECTION CRITERIA: Two independent reviewers selected RCTs which met predetermined inclusion criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data using predetermined forms and assessed the methodological quality of the trials using a validated scale. For dichotomous outcomes, relative risks (RR) were calculated and for continuous outcomes, weighted mean differences (WMD) of percentage change from baseline were calculated. Where heterogeneity existed (determined by a chi-square test) a random effects model was used. MAIN
resultsEleven studies (1429 subjects) met the inclusion criteria. The increase in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was found to be higher in the treatment group than in the control group with a WMD 8.1% (95%CI: 7.15,9.09) after two years of treatment and 16.1%(95%CI: 14.65,17.5) after four years. The RR for new vertebral fractures was not significant at two years [0.87 (95%CI: 0.51,1.46)] or at four years [0.9(95%CI: 0.71,1.14)]. The RR for new non-vertebral fractures was not significant at two years 1.2(95%CI: 0.68,2.1) but was increased at four years in the treated group 1.85(95%CI: 1.36,2.5), especially if used at high doses and in a non slow release form. The RR for gastrointestinal side effects was not significant at two years 2.18(95%CI: 0.86,1.21) but was increased at four years in the treated group 2.18(95%CI: 1.69,4.57) especially if fluoride was used at high doses and in a non slow release form. The number of withdrawals and dropouts was not different between treated and control groups at two and four years. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsAlthough fluoride has an ability to increase BMD at lumbar spine, it does not result in a reduction of vertebral fractures. In increasing the dose of fluoride, one increases the risk of non-vertebral fracture and gastrointestinal side effects without any effect on the vertebral fracture rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.