Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11034755›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Single dose piroxicam for acute postoperative pain.

J E Edwards, Y K Loke, R A Moore, H J McQuay

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Single dose oral analgesics for acute postoperative pain in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Piroxicam-β-cyclodextrin: a GI safer piroxicam.Current medicinal chemistry · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

J E EdwardsPain Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Oxford, UK, OX3 7LJ. jayne.edwards@pru.ox.ac.uk
Y K Loke
R A Moore
H J McQuay
University of Oxford · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPiroxicam is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with analgesic properties, and is used mainly for treating rheumatic disorders. Some drugs have been directly compared against each other within a trial setting to determine their relative efficacies, whereas other have not. It is possible, however, to compare analgesics indirectly by examining the effectiveness of each drug against placebo when used in similar clinical situations.

objectivesTo determine the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of single-dose piroxicam compared with placebo in moderate to severe postoperative pain. To compare the effects of piroxicam with other analgesics. SEARCH STRATEGY: Published reports were identified from systematic searching of Medline, Biological Abstracts, Embase, The Cochrane Library and the Oxford Pain Relief Database. Additional studies were identified from the reference lists of retrieved reports. SELECTION CRITERIA: The following inclusion criteria were used: full journal publication, randomised placebo controlled trial, double-blind design, adult patients, postoperative pain of moderate to severe intensity at the baseline assessment, postoperative administration of oral or intramuscular piroxicam. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Summed pain intensity and pain relief data were extracted and converted into dichotomous information to yield the number of patients obtaining at least 50% pain relief. This was used to calculate estimates of relative benefit and number-needed-to-treat for one patient to obtain at least 50% pain relief. Information was collected on adverse effects and estimates of relative risk and number-needed-to-harm were calculated. MAIN

resultsThree trials (141 patients) compared oral piroxicam 20 mg with placebo and one (15 patients) compared oral piroxicam 40 mg with placebo. For single doses of piroxicam 20 mg and 40 mg the respective numbers-needed-to-treat for at least 50% pain relief were 2.7 (2.1 to 3.8) [95% confidence interval] and 1.9 (1.2 to 4.3) [95% confidence interval] compared with placebo over 4-6 hours in moderate to severe postoperative pain. The reported incidence of adverse effects was no higher with piroxicam (20 mg or 40 mg) than with placebo. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsPiroxicam appears to be of similar efficacy to other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and intramuscular morphine 10 mg when used as a single oral dose in the treatment of moderate to severe postoperative pain.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdministration, OralAdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePiroxicamPostoperative PainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalPiroxicam

Identifiers

PMID11034755
PMCPMC4176623
OpenAlexW1667968113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.