Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11034746›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Antifungal therapies for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in people with cystic fibrosis.

H Elphick, K Southern

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Azoles for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis associated with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2004
    Pooled it
  5. Systemic azoles for asthma with fungal sensitisation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Article
  6. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Multi-Locus Microsatellite Typing of Colonising and InvasiveJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

H ElphickInstitute of Child Health, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Eaton Road, Liverpool, UK. helphick@liverpool.ac.uk
K Southern
Sheffield Children's Hospital · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAllergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA) is an allergic reaction to colonisation of the lungs with the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus and affects around 10% people with cystic fibrosis. ABPA is associated with an accelerated decline in lung function. Corticosteroids, in high doses, are the main treatment for ABPA although the long-term benefits are not clear and their many side effects are well documented. A group of compounds, the azoles, have activity against Aspergillus fumigatus and have been proposed as an alternative treatment for ABPA. Of this group, Itraconazole is the most active. A separate antifungal compound, Amphotericin B has been employed in aerosolised form to treat invasive infection with Aspergillus fumigatus, and may have potential for the treatment of ABPA. Antifungal therapy for ABPA in cystic fibrosis needs to be evaluated.

objectivesThe review tested the hypotheses that antifungal interventions for the treatment of ABPA in cystic fibrosis: 1. improve clinical status compared to placebo or standard therapy (no placebo); 2. do not have unacceptable adverse effects. If benefit was demonstrated, the optimal type, duration and dose of antifungal therapy was assessed. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group specialist trials register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings. In addition, pharmaceutical companies were approached. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, published or unpublished, where antifungal treatments have been compared to either placebo or no treatment, or where different doses of the same treatment have been used in the treatment of ABPA in patients with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: No completed randomised controlled trials were identified. MAIN

resultsNo completed randomised controlled trials were identified. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsAt present, there are no randomised controlled trials to evaluate the use of antifungal therapies for the treatment of ABPA in people with cystic fibrosis. Trials with clear outcome measures are needed to properly evaluate this potentially useful treatment for cystic fibrosis.

Indexed as

AdultAntifungal AgentsAspergillosis, Allergic BronchopulmonaryChildCystic FibrosisHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID11034746
OpenAlexW4245632000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.