Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11034740›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000

Once daily versus multiple daily dosing with intravenous aminoglycosides for cystic fibrosis.

K Tan, H Bunn

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

K TanChild Health, University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, Nottingham City Hospital, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, UK, NG5 1PB. Kelvin.Tan@nottingham.ac.uk
H Bunn
GlaxoSmithKline (Netherlands) · NLNottingham City Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with cystic fibrosis, who are chronically colonised with the organism Pseudomonas aeruginosa, often require repeated courses of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations. The properties of aminoglycosides suggest that they could be given in higher concentrations less often.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety of once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing of intravenous aminoglycoside antibiotics for the management of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cystic Fibrosis specialist trials register held at the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's editorial base, which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, handsearching relevant journals and handsearching abstract books of conference proceedings. Date of the most recent search: February 2000. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials, whether published or unpublished, in which once-daily dosing of aminoglycosides has been compared with multiple-daily dosing in terms of efficacy and/or toxicity, in patients with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. Authors of one study were contacted to obtain missing information. MAIN

resultsTwo trials reporting results from a total of 70 patients were included in this review. Both trials compared once-daily dosing with thrice-daily dosing reporting data on Forced Expiratory Volume at one second (FEV1), Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), nutritional status and side effects. There was no significant difference in efficacy or in the incidence of ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity between treatment groups. REVIEWER'S

conclusionsDespite a lack of difference between the two groups we feel that these results should be viewed with caution as the numbers of patients involved was small and lacks the power to detect a difference between the groups. This systematic review has highlighted the need for a well designed, adequately-powered, multicentre, randomised controlled trial assessing the efficacy of once-daily versus multiple-daily dosing of intravenous aminoglycosides for pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsChildCystic FibrosisDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansInjections, IntravenousLung DiseasesMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID11034740
OpenAlexW4255510326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.