SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Dietary marine fatty acids (fish oil) for asthma.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpidemiological studies suggest that a diet high in marine fatty acids (fish oil) may have beneficial effects on inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and possibly asthma.
objectives1. To determine the effect of marine n-3 fatty acid (fish oil) supplementation in asthma. 2. To determine the effect of a diet high in fish oil in asthma. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Airways Review Group register was search using the terms: marine fatty acids OR diet OR nutrition OR fish oil OR eicosapentaenoic acid OR EPA. Bibliographies of retrieved trials were searched and fish oil manufacturers contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials in patients with asthma more than two years of age were included. The study duration had to be in excess of 4 weeks. Double blind trials were preferred, but single-blind and open trials were also reviewed for possible inclusion. Three reviewers read each paper, blind to its identity. Decisions concerning inclusion were made by simple majority. Quality assessment was performed by all three reviewers independently. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The only comparison possible was between marine n-3 fatty acid supplementation and placebo. There were insufficient trials to examine dietary manipulation alone. MAIN
resultsEight randomised controlled trials conducted between 1986 and 1998 satisfied the inclusion criteria. Six were of parallel design and two were cross-over studies. Seven compared fish oil with placebo whilst one compared high dose vs low dose marine n-3 fatty acid supplementation. None of the included studies reported asthma exacerbations, health status or hospital admissions. There was no consistent effect on any of the analyzable outcomes: FEV1, peak flow rate, asthma symptoms, asthma medication use or bronchial hyper reactivity. The single study performed in children also combined dietary manipulation with fish oil supplementation and showed improved peak flow and reduced asthma medication use. There were no adverse events associated with fish oil supplements. Updated Search conducted August 2000. No new trials were found. REVIEWER'S
conclusionsThere is little evidence to recommend that people with asthma supplement or modify their dietary intake of marine n-3 fatty acids (fish oil) in order to improve their asthma control. Equally, there is no evidence that they are at risk if they do so.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.