SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2000
Intravenous fluids for abdominal aortic surgery.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intravenous fluids for abdominal aortic surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Cross-Sectional Guidelines for Therapy with Blood Components and Plasma Derivatives: Chapter 5 Human Albumin - Revised.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2016Article
- Perioperative care of the older patient.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2011Article
- Effect of lactate versus acetate-based intravenous fluids on acid-base balance in patients undergoing free flap reconstructive surgeries.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgery on the abdominal aorta, for aneurysmal and occlusive disease is a major undertaking which requires intensive support and fluid management. Blood products are often used, but the major fluid replacement is with crystalloids or colloids. There has been controversy for many years over which fluid is optimal and a number of studies have examined this subject, without any systematic review.
objectivesThe objective of this review was to determine the effectiveness of different non-blood replacement fluids used in surgery on the abdominal aorta with a view to identifying the optimal fluid for use in such surgery. SEARCH STRATEGY: All publications describing (or which might describe) randomised controlled trials of non-blood replacement fluids in abdominal aortic surgery were sought using the search strategy described by the Cochrane Review Group on Peripheral Vascular Diseases. This strategy includes hand searching of relevant medical journals and extensive MEDLINE and EMBASE searches. In addition, trials have been identified from searches of references included in those trials already retrieved. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials assessing the effects of one or more specific non-blood fluids used for replacement therapy in operations on, and confined to, the abdominal aorta. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted to pre-prepared tables and then entered into the Review Manager software where statistical analysis and descriptive subjective analysis were performed. MAIN
resultsNine trials, involving 412 patients were included. Patients undergoing aortic surgery had various physiological parameters measured before and after their operation (cardiac, respiratory, biochemical, haematological and protein). Ten fluids were studied: Ringer lactate, 5% dextrose in Ringer lactate, 5% dextrose in 0.45% saline, 5% dextrose in water, 1.8% saline, human albumin solution in Ringer lactate, human albumin solution in water, 5% dextrose with human albumin solution, Dextran 60, Hetastarch. Patients were randomised to fluid type. This review demonstrates that no single fluid has been shown to affect any outcome measure significantly more than any other across a range of outcome measures. However, each trial compared different fluids, and each fluid has not been compared against all others. The death rate in these studies was 2.9% (12 patients). REVIEWER'S
conclusionsFurther studies are required, with sufficient sample size and power, to draw any further conclusions. There are no studies examining the effects of combination fluid therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.