ArticleThe Journal of physiology2000
A single residue contributes to the difference between Kir4.1 and Kir1.1 channels in pH sensitivity, rectification and single channel conductance.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intracellular pH regulates the strength of the intrinsic inward rectification of Kir4.1/Kir5.1 channels.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2025Article
- Novel KCNJ10 Gene Variations Compromise Function of Inwardly Rectifying Potassium Channel 4.1.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2016Article
- Molecular aspects of structure, gating, and physiology of pH-sensitive background K2P and Kir K+-transport channels.Physiological reviews · 2015Review
- Control of KirBac3.1 potassium channel gating at the interface between cytoplasmic domains.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2014Article
- The cellular building blocks of breathing.Comprehensive Physiology · 2012Review
- Proton inhibition of unitary currents of vanilloid receptors.The Journal of general physiology · 2009Article
- Modulation of the heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channel by multiple neurotransmitters via Galphaq-coupled receptors.Journal of cellular physiology · 2008Article
- Protein kinase C dependent inhibition of the heteromeric Kir4.1-Kir5.1 channel.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2007Article
- Subunit-specific mechanisms and proton sensitivity of NMDA receptor channel block.The Journal of physiology · 2007Article
- pH sensing in the two-pore domain K+ channel, TASK2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005Article
- Molecular diversity and regulation of renal potassium channels.Physiological reviews · 2005Review
- Protons block BK channels by competitive inhibition with K+ and contribute to the limits of unitary currents at high voltages.The Journal of general physiology · 2004Article
- Molecular mechanisms of electrogenic sodium bicarbonate cotransport: structural and equilibrium thermodynamic considerations.The Journal of membrane biology · 2004Review
- Regulation of AE2-mediated Cl- transport by intracellular or by extracellular pH requires highly conserved amino acid residues of the AE2 NH2-terminal cytoplasmic domain.The Journal of general physiology · 2002Article
- Kir4.1 K+ channels are regulated by external cations.Channels (Austin, Tex.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Kir1.1 and Kir4.1 channels may be involved in the maintenance of pH and K+ homeostasis in renal epithelial cells and CO2 chemoreception in brainstem neurons. To understand the molecular determinants for their characteristic differences, the structure-function relationship was studied using site-directed mutagenesis. According to previous studies, Glu158 in Kir4.1 is likely to be the major rectification controller. This was confirmed in both Kir1.1 and Kir4.1. Mutation of Gly210, the second potential rectification controller, to glutamate did not show any additional effect on the inward rectification. More interestingly, we found that Glu158 in Kir4.1 was also an important residue contributing to single channel conductance and pH sensitivity. The E158N Kir4.1 mutant had a unitary conductance of 35 pS and a midpoint pH for channel inhibition (pKa) value of 6.72, both of which were almost identical to those of the wild-type (WT) Kir1.1. Flickering channel activity was clearly seen in the E158N mutant at positive membrane potentials, which is typical in the WT Kir1.1 but absent in the WT Kir4.1. Reverse mutation in Kir1.1 (N171E) reduced the unitary conductance to 27 pS (23 pS in WT Kir4.1). However, the pH sensitivity of this mutant did not show a marked difference from the WT Kir1.1. Therefore, it is possible that a residue(s) in addition to Asn171 is also involved. Thus we studied several other residues in both M2 and H5 regions. We found that joint mutations of Val140 and Asn171 to residues seen in Kir4.1 greatly reduced the pH sensitivity (pKa 6. 08). The V140T mutation in Kir1.1 led to a unitary conductance of approximately 70 pS, and the G210E mutation in Kir4.1 caused a decrease in pH sensitivity of 0.4 pH units. These results indicate that the pore-forming sequences are targets for modulations of multiple channel-biophysical properties and demonstrate a site contributing to rectification, unitary conductance and proton sensitivity in these Kir channels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.