Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11032616›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2000

Effects of topiramate on cognitive function.

P J Thompson, S A Baxendale, J S Duncan, J W Sander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Brain's compensatory response to drug-induced cognitive impairment.Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology · 2018
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Topiramate impairs cognitive function in methadone-maintained individuals with concurrent cocaine dependence.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2015
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Managing Essential Tremor.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P J ThompsonEpilepsy Research Group, Institute of Neurology, University College London, and National Society for Epilepsy, Chalfont St Peter, Gerrards Cross, Bucks SL9 ORJ, UK. PamT@epilepsyrise.co.uk
S A Baxendale
J S Duncan
J W Sander

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the impact of topiramate on tests of intellect and other cognitive processes.

methodsThis was a retrospective study. The neuropsychological test scores of 18 patients obtained before and after the introduction of treatment with topiramate (median dose 300 mg) were compared with changes in test performance of 18 patients who had undergone repeat neuropsychological assessments at the same time intervals. Complaints of cognitive decline precipitated referral for reassessment in five cases in the topiramate treated group. The groups were matched for age and intellectual level at the time of the first assessment. Patients were assessed using the WAIS-R, tests of verbal and non-verbal memory, language, and perceptual processing. A subgroup of patients underwent a brief reassessment after the withdrawal or substantial reduction of topiramate.

resultsRepeat assessments in those taking topiramate were associated with a significant deterioration in many domains, which were not seen in the comparison group. The greatest changes were for verbal IQ, verbal fluency, and verbal learning (p<0. 001). Improvements in verbal fluency (p<0.05), verbal learning (p<0. 01), and digit span (p<0.001) were recorded in those patients who had topiramate withdrawn or reduced.

conclusionsIn our patient group topiramate had a negative impact on cognition which was consistent with subjective complaints of patients. Tests requiring verbal processing seemed especially sensitive to the drug. A decline in verbal intellect (VIQ), a measure which has been considered by some to be insensitive to antiepileptic drug effects, was particularly striking. Caution is warranted in the interpretation of the findings due to methodological limitations of the study design. Further investigation of mediating factors such as serum concentrations, comedication, and other potential risk factors, however, is needed to enable appropriate targeting of treatment with this effective antiepileptic agent.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnticonvulsantsCognitionEpilepsyFemaleFructoseHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsTopiramateAnticonvulsantsFructoseTopiramate

Identifiers

PMID11032616
PMCPMC1763392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.