Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11029682›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2000

Reporting by physicians of impaired drivers and potentially impaired drivers. The Committee on Bioethical Issues of the Medical Society of the State of New York.

J T Berger, F Rosner, P Kark, A J Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Trends in Confidentiality and Disclosure.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Drowsy Driving Considerations in Non-Commercial Drivers for the Sleep Physician.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mandatory reporting by physicians of patients potentially unfit to drive.Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal · 2008
    Article
  14. Bringing a generalist approach to the problems of older patients.Journal of general internal medicine · 2000
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J T BergerWinthrop University Hospital, Mineola, NY, State University of New York at Stony Brook School of Medicine, Stony Brook, NY, USA. jberger@ms.cc.sunysb.edu
F Rosner
P Kark
A J Bennett

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physicians routinely care for patients whose ability to operate a motor vehicle is compromised by a physical or cognitive condition. Physician management of this health information has ethical and legal implications. These concerns have been insufficiently addressed by professional organizations and public agencies. The legal status in the United States and Canada of reporting of impaired drivers is reviewed. The American Medical Association's position is detailed. Finally, the Bioethics Committee of the Medical Society of the State of New York proposes elements for an ethically defensible public response to this problem.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAmerican Medical AssociationAutomobile DrivingConfidentialityEthics, MedicalHumansNew YorkOrganizational PolicyPhysician's RolePsychomotor DisordersSocieties, MedicalUnited StatesHealth Care and Public HealthLegal ApproachMedical Society of the State of New York

Identifiers

PMID11029682
PMCPMC1495589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.