ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2000
Juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Recommendations for the diagnosis and management of cln3 disease (batten disease) using the Delphi consensus methodology.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Guideline
- Late infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis: A case report with review of literature.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A case of juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (JNCL) diagnosed on the basis of clinical features, electrophysiologic studies and skin electron microscopy is reported. JNCL was suspected on the basis of characteristic symptoms including progressive loss of vision, seizures, mental retardation and motor disabilities. Diagnosis was confirmed by neurophysiological and biopsy studies. The disease is caused by 23 different mutations in a gene recently isolated on chromosome 16 p11.2-12.1. Although universally fatal, characterisation of mutations can help in prenatal diagnosis in future pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11028125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.