ArticleSexually transmitted infections2000
Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in young men in north west London.
Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the general population: a meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Pooled it
- Genital chlamydia prevalence in Europe and non-European high income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Chlamydia trachomatis in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and analysis of prevalence studies.Sexually transmitted infections · 2004Pooled it
- Chlamydia trachomatis infection and sexual behaviour among female students attending higher education in the Republic of Ireland.BMC public health · 2009Article
- Opportunistic screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in men attending three different secondary healthcare settings.Sexually transmitted infections · 2007Article
- Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence in men in the mid-west of Ireland.Sexually transmitted infections · 2004Article
- Provider willingness to screen all sexually active adolescents for chlamydia.Sexually transmitted infections · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChlamydia trachomatis is the most common, treatable, bacterial sexually transmitted infection in England and Wales. Among men, chlamydial infection is an important cause of non-gonococcal urethritis, epididymitis, and proctitis. The case for wider screening among women has been accepted by an expert advisory group. In the absence of estimates of the prevalence of infection in men, its potential impact at the population level is difficult to assess.
objectiveTo estimate the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in young men in clinic and community based samples in north west London.
methodCross sectional survey in healthcare centres and general practices in north west London. 1002 males aged 18-35 years, living in north west London, were recruited by staff in occupational health departments, general practices, student health services, and a "well man" clinic and by postal recruitment in four GP practices. The men were tested for C trachomatis using the ligase chain reaction assay on urine samples. The main outcome measure was prevalence of C trachomatis infection in men aged 18-35 years.
resultsThe overall response rate was 51%. Prevalence of confirmed infection was 1.9% (95% CI: 1.14% to 2.96%) in all men. Best estimated minimum prevalence of infection was 1% (95% CI: 0.58% to 1.50%). Estimated prevalence was highest among men aged over 30 years.
conclusionsThe estimated prevalence among men is commensurate with that described for female populations in London. The results suggest that recruitment of men to screening programmes would be difficult. However, a higher proportion of chlamydial infection may be detected in men than in women by existing approaches to control through genitourinary medicine clinic based case finding and contact tracing. Screening of young women and the contact tracing of the male partners of positive females may be an efficient approach to improving chlamydia control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.