Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11026880›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2000

Comparison of risk factors for four sexually transmitted infections: results from a study of attenders at three genitourinary medicine clinics in England.

G Hughes, M Catchpole, P A Rogers, A R Brady, G Kinghorn, D Mercey, N Thin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Prevalence and risk factors of the whole spectrum of sexually transmitted diseases in male incoming prisoners in France.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2009
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. A sexual health and HIV strategy for England.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G HughesPHLS Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, London. ghughes@phls.nhs.uk
M Catchpole
P A Rogers
A R Brady
G Kinghorn
D Mercey
N Thin
National Health Service · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the risk factors for four common sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in attenders at three large urban genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics in England.

methodsClinical, demographic, and behavioural data on attenders at two clinics in London and one in Sheffield were collected. Risk factors associated with first episodes of genital warts and genital herpes simplex virus (HSV), and uncomplicated gonorrhoea and chlamydia were investigated using the presence of each of these STIs as the outcome variable in separate multiple logistic regression analyses.

resultsUsing data on the first attendance of the 18,238 patients attending the clinics in 1996, the risk of a gonorrhoea or chlamydia diagnosis was strongly associated with teenagers compared with those aged over 34, with black Caribbeans and black Africans compared with whites, and increased with the number of sexual partners. The risk of genital warts or HSV diagnosis was lowest in black Caribbeans and black Africans compared with whites and was not associated with the number of sexual partners. While genital warts were associated with younger age, odds ratios were much lower compared with those for the bacterial infections. Genital HSV diagnoses were not associated with age.

conclusionsThis study of GUM clinic attenders suggests a reduction in the incidence of bacterial STIs may be achievable through targeted sexual health promotion focusing particularly on black ethnic minorities, teenagers, and those with multiple sexual partnerships. Viral STIs were less clearly associated with population subgroups and a broader population based approach to sexual health promotion may be more effective in controlling these infections.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceChlamydia InfectionsCondylomata AcuminataEnglandFemaleGenital Diseases, FemaleGenital Diseases, MaleGonorrheaHerpes GenitalisHumansMaleRisk FactorsSexual BehaviorSexually Transmitted Diseases

Identifiers

PMID11026880
PMCPMC1744175
OpenAlexW2137178252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.