Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11023962›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2000

Molecular strategies for interrupting arthropod-borne virus transmission by mosquitoes.

C D Blair, Z N Adelman, K E Olson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Characterization of Viral Interference inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Mosquito immune responses to arbovirus infections.Current opinion in insect science · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C D BlairArthropod-Borne and Infectious Diseases Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1677, USA. cblair@cvmbs.colostate.edu
Z N Adelman
K E Olson
Colorado State University · US

Funding

INTERFERENCE TO DENGUE VIRUS REPLICATION IN MOSQUITOESR01AI034014 · NIAID · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY-FORT COLLINS · PI BLAIR, CAROL D · 1993 to 2006
$1.3M
MOLECULAR GENETIC CONTROL OF VECTOR POTENTIALR01AI025629 · NIAID · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY-FORT COLLINS · PI CARLSON, JONATHAN O · 1988 to 1998
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI25629NIAID NIH HHS AI34014NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI034014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arthropod-borne virus (arbovirus) infections cause a number of emerging and resurgent human and veterinary infectious diseases. Traditional means of controlling arbovirus diseases include vaccination of susceptible vertebrates and mosquito control, but in many cases these have been unavailable or ineffective, and so novel strategies for disease control are needed. One possibility is genetic manipulation of mosquito vectors to render them unable to transmit arboviruses. This review describes recent work to test the concept of pathogen-derived resistance in arthropods by expression of viral genes in mosquito cell cultures and mosquitoes. Sense and antisense genome sequences from La Crosse virus (LAC) (a member of the Bunyaviridae) and dengue viruses serotypes 1 to 4 (DEN-1 to DEN-4) (members of the Flaviviridae) were expressed in mosquito cells from double-subgenomic and replicon vectors based on Sindbis virus (a member of the Togaviridae). The cells were then challenged with homologous or related viruses. For LAC, expression of antisense sequences from the small (S) genome segment, particularly full-length antisense S RNA, effectively interfered with replication of challenge virus, whereas expression of either antisense or sense RNA from the medium (M) segment was completely ineffective in LAC inhibition. Expression of sense and antisense RNA derived from certain regions of the DEN genome also blocked homologous virus replication more effectively than did RNA from other regions. Other parameters of RNA-mediated interference have been defined, such as the time when replication is blocked and the minimum size of effector RNA. The mechanism of RNA inhibition has not been determined, although it resembles double-stranded RNA interference in other nonvertebrate systems. Prospects for application of molecular strategies to control arbovirus diseases are briefly reviewed.

Indexed as

Viral InterferenceAnimalsArbovirusesArbovirus InfectionsCulicidaeGene ExpressionGene Transfer TechniquesGenome, ViralHumansInsect VectorsRNA, AntisenseRNA, ViralViral ProteinsVirus ReplicationRNA, AntisenseRNA, ViralViral Proteins

Identifiers

PMID11023962
PMCPMC88954
OpenAlexW2100659854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.