ArticleBiophysical journal2000
Modeling study of exocytosis in neuroendocrine cells: influence of the geometrical parameters.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Close agreement between deterministic versus stochastic modeling of first-passage time to vesicle fusion.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- α3β4 Acetylcholine Nicotinic Receptors Are Components of the Secretory Machinery Clusters in Chromaffin Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Influence of T-Bar on Calcium Concentration Impacting Release Probability.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- How does the stimulus define exocytosis in adrenal chromaffin cells?Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2018Review
- The Differential Organization of F-Actin Alters the Distribution of Organelles in Cultured When Compared to Native Chromaffin Cells.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2017Article
- Exocytotic dynamics in human chromaffin cells: experiments and modeling.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2013Article
- Article
- Modeling F-actin cortex influence on the secretory properties of neuroendocrine cells.Communicative & integrative biology · 2011Article
- The organization of the secretory machinery in chromaffin cells as a major factor in modeling exocytosis.HFSP journal · 2010Article
- Pancreatic islet cells: a model for calcium-dependent peptide release.HFSP journal · 2010Article
- Exocytotic dynamics and calcium cooperativity effects in the calyx of Held synapse: a modelling study.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2010Article
- Modeling of quantal neurotransmitter release kinetics in the presence of fixed and mobile calcium buffers.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2008Article
- Determining calcium concentration in heterogeneous model systems using multiple indicators.Cell calcium · 2007Article
- Consequences of molecular-level Ca2+ channel and synaptic vesicle colocalization for the Ca2+ microdomain and neurotransmitter exocytosis: a monte carlo study.Biophysical journal · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exocytosis in neuroendocrine cells is a process triggered by Ca(2+). A Monte Carlo simulation of secretion has been developed which, together with the diffusion of calcium, buffered by endogenous and/or exogenously added chelators, also accounts for the dynamics of exocytosis for a pool of readily releasable vesicles. Different distributions of channels and vesicles (random or correlated) are studied. A local study of exocytosis is carried out by obtaining capacitance time courses for the different types of release-ready vesicle pools (correlated or not with Ca(2+) channels). Also, depending upon the kinetic constants for the exocytotic process, we study the levels of local Ca(2+) needed to trigger secretion. Our simulations show that a strong heterogeneity in the calcium concentrations at the different sites of exocytosis is a requirement for reproducing the experimentally observed biphasic response in chromaffin cells in situ (Voets, T., E. Neher, and T. Moser. 1999. Neuron. 23:607-615). Correlated nonuniform distributions of channels and vesicles and the existence of diffusion barriers are shown to quantitatively explain the experimental data on chromaffin cells in situ. The first description requires a deeply heterogeneous distribution, with vesicles attached to the channels or far from them, but never at middle distances. The second description is able to reproduce biphasic release even for uniformly (readily releasable) distributed vesicles. We quantify the degree of inhomogeneity in the distribution of vesicles and how porous the diffusion barriers should be to account for the observed biphasic response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.