ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000
Data protection legislation: interpretation and barriers to research.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05106790 (Efficacy of mHealth and Education-led Peer Counseling of Patients With Hypertension and Coronary Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of mHealth and Education-led Peer Counseling of Patients With Hypertension and Coronary Artery Disease: a Double-blinded Pragmatic Randomized Control Trial With Factorial Design, Pakistan
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.BMC medical ethics · 2016Pooled it
- A systematic review of barriers to data sharing in public health.BMC public health · 2014Pooled it
- Effectiveness of a Multifaceted Mobile Health Intervention (Multi-Aid-Package) in Medication Adherence and Treatment Outcomes Among Patients With Hypertension in a Low- to Middle-Income Country: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2024Trial
- Prevalence and associated factors of adherence to antihypertensive medication: a nationwide cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Studying military and Veteran health using a life-course approach: Lessons learned from a Canadian record linkage study.Journal of military, veteran and family health · 2024Article
- Article
- Understanding the ethical and legal considerations of Digital Pathology.The journal of pathology. Clinical research · 2022Article
- Patient/family views on data sharing in rare diseases: study in the European LeukoTreat project.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2016Article
- Strategies designed to help healthcare professionals to recruit participants to research studies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Review
- [Research and protection of personal data in Primary Care].Atencion primaria · 2012Article
- Legal and ethical considerations in processing patient-identifiable data without patient consent: lessons learnt from developing a disease register.Journal of medical ethics · 2007Article
- Consent, confidentiality, and the Data Protection Act.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Article
- Are consenters representative of a target population?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2005Article
- Sharing patient data: competing demands of privacy, trust and research in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2005Article
- Guidelines for confidentiality and cancer registration.British journal of cancer · 2005Article
- Legal aspects of records based medical research.Archives of disease in childhood · 2004Article
- Experiences of the BMJ ethics committee.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004Article
- Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the UK general population.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2004Review
- Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study.Journal of medical ethics · 2004Article
- Supporting ethical practice in primary care research: strategies for action.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.