Cancer registries fear imminent collapse.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Ethical justification for conducting public health surveillance without patient consent.American journal of public health · 2012
   Article
2. Cancer registries fear collapse. Need for patient consent for cancer registration creates logistical nightmare.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001
   Article
3. Data protection and patients' consent. Informed consent should be sought before data are used by registries.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Data protection and patients' consent. GMC is greater threat to research than the act.2001
• Commented on by
  Data protection and patients' consent. Informed consent should be sought before data are used by registries.2001
• Commented on by
  Cancer registries fear collapse. Need for patient consent for cancer registration creates logistical nightmare.2001
• Comment on
  UK drugs industry sets up trials register.2000

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as