Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11015412›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2000

Comparison between plasma and whole blood specimens for detection of Aspergillus DNA by PCR.

J Loeffler, H Hebart, U Brauchle, U Schumacher, H Einsele

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microorganisms · 2023
    Review
  2. Molecular Diagnostic Testing for Aspergillus.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinical utility and development of biomarkers in invasive aspergillosis.Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluation of molecular diagnostic assays for fungal infections.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2006
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J LoefflerMedizinische Klinik, Abteilung II, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. juergen.loeffler@med.uni-tuebingen.de
H Hebart
U Brauchle
U Schumacher
H Einsele

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ninety-six plasma and whole blood specimens from nine selected patients were analyzed for the presence of Aspergillus DNA. Nineteen specimens from three patients with proven aspergillosis were PCR positive in both materials, whereas an additional 22 were PCR positive in whole blood only. All 36 samples from six patients without signs of aspergillosis were negative in both assays. We conclude that although plasma and whole blood spiked with Aspergillus conidia showed an identical lower detection limit (10 CFU), the sensitivity of plasma PCR was lower than that of PCR performed on whole blood samples.

Indexed as

AspergillosisAspergillusDNA, FungalHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID11015412
PMCPMC87485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.