Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11015358›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2000

Multicenter evaluation of epidemiological typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains by repetitive-element PCR analysis. The European Study Group on Epidemiological Markers of the ESCMID.

A Deplano, A Schuermans, J Van Eldere, W Witte, H Meugnier, J Etienne, H Grundmann, D Jonas, G T Noordhoek, J Dijkstra and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular typing ofHeliyon · 2019
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Evidence of a clonal expansion of Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 19A in adults as in children assessed by the DiversiLab® system.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: update on the molecular epidemiology and clinical presentation, with a focus on Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus saprophyticus.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2012
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 14 institutions in 10 countries.

A DeplanoReference Laboratory for Staphylococci, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Hôpital Erasme, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
A Schuermans
J Van Eldere
W Witte
H Meugnier
J Etienne
H Grundmann
D Jonas
G T Noordhoek
J Dijkstra
A van Belkum
W van Leeuwen
P T Tassios
N J Legakis
A van der Zee
A Bergmans
D S Blanc
F C Tenover
B C Cookson
G O'Neil
M J Struelens
Friesland College · NLHôpital Edouard Herriot · FRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRRega Institute for Medical Research · BERotterdam University of Applied Sciences · NLSt. Elisabeth Hospital · CWSt. Josefskrankenhaus Freiburg · DECenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USErasmus Hospital · BENational Public Health Laboratory · NPPublic Health England · GBRobert Koch Institute · DEUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BEUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid and efficient epidemiologic typing systems would be useful to monitor transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at both local and interregional levels. To evaluate the intralaboratory performance and interlaboratory reproducibility of three recently developed repeat-element PCR (rep-PCR) methods for the typing of MRSA, 50 MRSA strains characterized by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) (SmaI) analysis and epidemiological data were blindly typed by inter-IS256, 16S-23S ribosomal DNA (rDNA), and MP3 PCR in 12 laboratories in eight countries using standard reagents and protocols. Performance of typing was defined by reproducibility (R), discriminatory power (D), and agreement with PFGE analysis. Interlaboratory reproducibility of pattern and type classification was assessed visually and using gel analysis software. Each typing method showed a different performance level in each center. In the center performing best with each method, inter-IS256 PCR typing achieved R = 100% and D = 100%; 16S-23S rDNA PCR, R = 100% and D = 82%; and MP3 PCR, R = 80% and D = 83%. Concordance between rep-PCR type and PFGE type ranged by center: 70 to 90% for inter-IS256 PCR, 44 to 57% for 16S-23S rDNA PCR, and 53 to 54% for MP3 PCR analysis. In conclusion, the performance of inter-IS256 PCR typing was similar to that of PFGE analysis in some but not all centers, whereas other rep-PCR protocols showed lower discrimination and intralaboratory reproducibility. None of these assays, however, was sufficiently reproducible for interlaboratory exchange of data.

Indexed as

Methicillin ResistanceBacterial Typing TechniquesDNA, RibosomalElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldEuropeHumansPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 23SSoftwareStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 23S

Identifiers

PMID11015358
PMCPMC87431
OpenAlexW1863772987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.