ArticleIrish journal of medical science
Profile of attendance at a maternity hospital emergency room.
Article in Irish journal of medical science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and management of adults referred to a teaching hospital first seizure clinic.Postgraduate medical journal · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDirect presentations to secondary care that could have been managed in primary care have been the subject of much study. Social factors may influence the decision to present directly to secondary care services.
aimTo determine the profile and primary care service use of patients attending a maternity hospital emergency room (ER).
methodsA self-administered, questionnaire based, cross-sectional study was performed over a period of one month.
resultsOf 350 patients attending the ER, 343 (98%) completed a questionnaire. Mean age of patients attending was 28 years (range 16-65). Thirty seven per cent were eligible for free medical care and 39% belonged to socio-economic group six. Fifty nine per cent attended outside normal hours, 31% had a female general practitioner (GP) and 38% were referred by a GP to the ER. Twenty eight per cent had seen their GP in the previous three days, 31% had consulted a GP with their current problem and 58% felt "comfortable" or "very comfortable" attending their GP with a gynaecological complaint.
conclusionsThis study indicates that the service is responsible for a considerable workload, with a low level of use of primary care services by those attending.
Indexed as
Identifiers
11006668What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.