Evidence map›Paper›PMID 11003652›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2000

Role of Cdc42p in pheromone-stimulated signal transduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

J J Moskow, A S Gladfelter, R E Lamson, P M Pryciak, D J Lew

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Mechanisms and Virulence Factors ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cell-cycle control of cell polarity in yeast.The Journal of cell biology · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Cdc42- and Rac-interactive binding (CRIB) domain mediates functions of coronin.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Symmetry breaking in the life cycle of the budding yeast.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2009
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J J MoskowDepartment of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
A S Gladfelter
R E Lamson
P M Pryciak
D J Lew
Duke Medical Center · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

YEAST PHEROMONE SIGNAL TRANSDUCTIONR01GM057769 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI PRYCIAK, PETER M · 1997 to 2023
$7.6M
CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT THAT MONITORS MORPHOGENESISR01GM053050 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LEW, DANIEL J · 1995 to 2012
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM53050NIGMS NIH HHS GM57769NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM053050NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM057769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CDC42 encodes a highly conserved GTPase of the Rho family that is best known for its role in regulating cell polarity and actin organization. In addition, various studies of both yeast and mammalian cells have suggested that Cdc42p, through its interaction with p21-activated kinases (PAKs), plays a role in signaling pathways that regulate target gene transcription. However, recent studies of the yeast pheromone response pathway suggested that prior results with temperature-sensitive cdc42 mutants were misleading and that Cdc42p and the Cdc42p-PAK interaction are not involved in signaling. To clarify this issue, we have identified and characterized novel viable pheromone-resistant cdc42 alleles that retain the ability to perform polarity-related functions. Mutation of the Cdc42p residue Val36 or Tyr40 caused defects in pheromone signaling and in the localization of the Ste20p PAK in vivo and affected binding to the Ste20p Cdc42p-Rac interactive binding (CRIB) domain in vitro. Epistasis analysis suggested that they affect the signaling step at which Ste20p acts, and overproduction of Ste20p rescued the defect. These results suggest that Cdc42p is in fact required for pheromone response and that interaction with the PAK Ste20p is critical for that role. Furthermore, the ste20DeltaCRIB allele, previously used to disrupt the Cdc42p-Ste20p interaction, behaved as an activated allele, largely bypassing the signaling defect of the cdc42 mutants. Additional observations lead us to suggest that Cdc42p collaborates with the SH3-domain protein Bem1p to facilitate signal transduction, possibly by providing a cell surface scaffold that aids in the local concentration of signaling kinases, thus promoting activation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade by Ste20p.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAllelescdc42 GTP-Binding Protein, Saccharomyces cerevisiaeCell CycleEpistasis, GeneticFungal ProteinsGenes, LethalGenetic Complementation TestIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesMating FactorMembrane ProteinsMutationPeptidesPheromonesAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBEM1 protein, S cerevisiaecdc42 GTP-Binding Protein, Saccharomyces cerevisiaeFungal ProteinsFUS1 protein, S cerevisiaeIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMAP Kinase Kinase KinasesMating FactorMembrane ProteinsPeptidesPheromonesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSTE20 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID11003652
PMCPMC86308
OpenAlexW2119065636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.