Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10995785›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2000

Interactions between immune and bone cells: new insights with many remaining questions.

J Lorenzo

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The role of C5a-C5aR1 axis in bone pathophysiology: A mini-review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. [Liver cirrhosis and secondary osteoporosis].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. HO-1 in Bone Biology: Potential Therapeutic Strategies for Osteoporosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J LorenzoUniversity of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06030, USA. jlorenzo@nso2.uchc.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Receptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearAlveolar Bone LossAnimalsBone and BonesCarrier ProteinsCytokinesGlycoproteinsHomeostasisHumansMembrane GlycoproteinsMiceOsteoblastsOsteoclastsOsteoprotegerinRANK LigandReceptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa BCarrier ProteinsCytokinesGlycoproteinsMembrane GlycoproteinsOsteoprotegerinRANK LigandReceptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa BReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearReceptors, Tumor Necrosis FactorTNFRSF11A protein, humanTnfrsf11a protein, mouseTNFRSF11B protein, humanTnfrsf11b protein, mouseTNFSF11 protein, humanTnfsf11 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID10995785
PMCPMC381401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.