Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10991852›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2000

Distribution and antimicrobial activity of fosfomycin in the interstitial fluid of human soft tissues.

M Frossard, C Joukhadar, B M Erovic, P Dittrich, P E Mrass, M Van Houte, H Burgmann, A Georgopoulos, M Müller

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. From Environmental Organism to Nosocomial Threat:Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Fosfomycin: the characteristics, activity, and use in critical care.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M FrossardDivision of Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Vienna Medical School, Vienna, Austria.
C Joukhadar
B M Erovic
P Dittrich
P E Mrass
M Van Houte
H Burgmann
A Georgopoulos
M Müller
PharmacoGenetics (China) · CNMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Graz · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fosfomycin is a broad-spectrum antibiotic which is established as therapy for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections. In addition, preliminary data indicate that fosfomycin has a potential role in the treatment of soft tissue infections. However, the use of fosfomycin has not been established for this condition, and it is unclear whether the level of fosfomycin penetration into human soft tissues is high enough to eradicate relevant pathogens. To better characterize the antibiotic potential of fosfomycin, we applied a combined in vivo pharmacokinetic-in vitro pharmacodynamic model to human volunteers. For this purpose fosfomycin concentrations in vivo in the fluid of the interstitial space of human soft tissues were measured by microdialysis following intravenous infusion of 4 or 8 g of fosfomycin (n = 6). Subsequently, bacterial isolates with relevance for soft tissue infections were exposed to concentrations according to the in vivo pharmacokinetic profile in the interstitial space fluid obtained by microdialysis. Our experiments indicated a high degree of soft tissue penetration for fosfomycin, with ratios of the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 8 h for muscle (AUC(0-8(muscle)))/AUC(0-8(serum)) of 0.48+/-0.08 and 0.53+/-0.04 and ratios of AUC(0-8(adipose tissue))/AUC(0-8(serum)) of 0.74+/-0.12 and 0.71+/-0.11 following administration of 4 and 8 g, respectively. In corresponding in vitro simulation experiments with selected isolates of Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter cloacae, and Serratia marcescens for which MICs were 16 microg/ml, organisms were undetectable after a single dosing interval. Fosfomycin exhibits a strong ability to penetrate into the fluid of the interstitial space of soft tissues and reaches levels sufficient to substantially inhibit the growth of relevant bacteria at the target site. We therefore conclude that fosfomycin might qualify as an alternative candidate for the therapy of soft tissue infections.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveCross-Over StudiesExtracellular SpaceFosfomycinHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrodialysisModels, BiologicalMuscle, SkeletalAnti-Bacterial AgentsFosfomycin

Identifiers

PMID10991852
PMCPMC90143
OpenAlexW2106617775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.