Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10991830›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2000

Comparative pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, trovafloxacin, and moxifloxacin after single oral administration in healthy volunteers.

A Lubasch, I Keller, K Borner, P Koeppe, H Lode

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 184 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Optimization Strategies Aimed to Increase the Efficacy ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

A LubaschDepartment of Chest and Infectious Diseases, Chest Hospital Heckeshorn, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany. halocheck@zedat.fu-berlin.de
I Keller
K Borner
P Koeppe
H Lode
Franklin University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In an open, randomized, six-period crossover study, the pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and trovafloxacin were compared after a single oral dose in 12 healthy volunteers (6 men and 6 women). The volunteers received 250 mg of ciprofloxacin, 400 mg of gatifloxacin, 600 mg of grepafloxacin, 500 mg of levofloxacin, 400 mg of moxifloxacin, and 200 mg of trovafloxacin. The concentrations of the six fluoroquinolones in serum and urine were measured by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. Blood and urine samples were collected before and at different time points up to 48 h after medication. Levofloxacin had the highest peak concentration (C(max), in micrograms per milliliter) (6.21+/-1.34), followed by moxifloxacin (4.34+/-1.61) and gatifloxacin (3.42+/-0.74). Elimination half-lives ranged from 12.12+/-3.93 h (grepafloxacin) to 5.37+/-0.82 h (ciprofloxacin). The total areas under the curve (AUC(tot), in microgram-hours per milliliter) for levofloxacin (44.8+/-4.4), moxifloxacin (39.3+/-5.35), and gatifloxacin (30+/-3.8) were significantly higher than that for ciprofloxacin (5.75+/-1.25). Calculated from a normalized dose of 200 mg, the highest C(max)s (in micrograms per milliliter) were observed for levofloxacin (2.48 +/-0.53), followed by moxifloxacin (2.17+/-0.81) and trovafloxacin (2.09+/-0.58). The highest AUC(tot) (in microgram-hours per milliliter) for a 200-mg dose were observed for moxifloxacin (19.7+/-2.67) and trovafloxacin (19.5+/-3.1); the lowest was observed for ciprofloxacin (4.6+/-1.0). No serious adverse event was observed during the study period. The five recently developed fluoroquinolones (gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and trovafloxacin) showed greater bioavailability, longer half-lives, and higher C(max)s than ciprofloxacin.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAnti-Infective AgentsArea Under CurveChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCross-Over StudiesElectrocardiographyFemaleFluoroquinolonesHalf-LifeHumansMaleAnti-Infective AgentsFluoroquinolones

Identifiers

PMID10991830
PMCPMC90121
OpenAlexW2089987663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.