ArticleThe Journal of physiology2000
Inhibition of a mammalian large conductance, calcium-sensitive K+ channel by calmodulin-binding peptides.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bidirectional control of BK channel open probability by CAMKII and PKC in medial vestibular nucleus neurons.Journal of neurophysiology · 2011Article
- A protein interaction network for the large conductance Ca(2+)-activated K(+) channel in the mouse cochlea.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2009Article
- Calmodulin kinase II inhibition disrupts cardiomyopathic effects of enhanced green fluorescent protein.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2008Article
- Contribution of potential EF hand motifs to the calcium-dependent gating of a mouse brain large conductance, calcium-sensitive K(+) channel.The Journal of physiology · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The large conductance, calcium-sensitive K+ channel (BKCa channel) is a voltage-activated ion channel in which direct calcium binding shifts gating to more negative cellular membrane potentials. We hypothesized that the calcium-binding domain of BKCa channels may mimic the role played by calmodulin (CaM) in the activation of calcium-CaM-dependent enzymes, in which a tonic inhibitory constraint is removed on CaM binding. To examine such a hypothesis, we used peptides from the autoregulatory domains of CaM kinase II (CK291-317) and cNOS (the constitutive nitric oxide synthase; cNOS725-747) as probes for the calcium-dependent activation of murine BKCa channels transiently expressed in HEK 293 cells. We found that these CaM-binding peptides produced potent, time-dependent inhibition of mammalian BKCa channel current following voltage-dependent activation. Inhibition was observed in both the presence and the absence of cytosolic free calcium. Similar application of CK291-31 had no effect on either the amplitude or kinetics of voltage-dependent, macroscopic currents recorded from rabbit smooth muscle Kv1.5 potassium channels transiently expressed in HEK 293 cells. Cytosolic application of both CK291-317 and tetraethylammonium (TEA) produced an additive and non-competitive block of BKCa current. This finding suggests that the peptide-binding site is distinct (e.g. outside the pore region of the channel) from that of TEA. Our results are thus consistent with a model in which the BKCa channel's voltage-dependent gating process is under an intramolecular constraint that is relieved upon calcium binding. The intrinsic calcium sensor of the channel may thus interact with an inhibitory domain present in the BKCa channel, and by doing so, remove an inhibitory 'constraint' that permits voltage-dependent gating to occur at more negative potentials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.