ArticlePharmaceutical research2000
In vivo specific binding characteristics and pharmacokinetics of a 1,4-dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist in the senescent mouse brain.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging early embryonic calcium activity with GCaMP6s transgenic zebrafish.Developmental biology · 2017Article
- The L-type channel antagonist isradipine is neuroprotective in a mouse model of Parkinson's disease.Neurobiology of disease · 2011Article
- In vivo characterization of muscarinic receptors in peripheral tissues: evaluation of bladder selectivity of anticholinergic agents to treat overactive bladder.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo characterize the in vivo specific binding and pharmacokinetics of a 1,4-dihydropyridine (DHP) calcium channel antagonist, PN 200-110, in the senescent brain, using senescence-accelerated prone mice (SAMP8) and senescence-resistant mice (SAMR1).
methodsBlood, brain, and heart samples were taken periodically from SAMR1 and SAMP8 following intravenous injection of (+)-[3H]PN 200-110, and the concentration of (+)-[3H]PN 200-110 in the plasma and tissues was determined. In addition, the in vivo specific binding of (+)-[3H]PN 200-110 in the brains of SAMRI and SAMP8 was measured periodically after intravenous injection of the radioligand.
resultsThere was very little significant difference between SAMR1 and SAMP8 in terms of the half-life (t(1/2)), total body clearance (CL(tot)), steady-state volume of distribution (Vd(ss)). and AUC for the plasma concentration of (+)-[3H]PN 200-110 after intravenous injection of the radioligand. The brain concentration (AUCbrain) for (+)-[3H]PN 200-110 and the brain/plasma AUC ratio (AUCbrain/AUCplasma) were significantly lower in SAMP8 than in SAMR1, and the heart concentration (AUCheart) and the heart/plasma AUC ratio (AUCheart/AUCplasma) were similar in both strains. Also, the brain/plasma unbound AUC ratio (AUCbrain/AUCplasma-free) for (+)-[3H]PN 200-110 was significantly lower in SAMP8 than in SAMRI. The in vivo specific binding (AUCspecific binding, maximal number of binding sites: Bmax) of (+)-[3H]PN 200-110 was significantly lower in brain particulate fractions of SAMP8 than SAMR1.
conclusionsThe concentration and in vivo specific binding of (+)-[3H]PN 200-110 was significantly reduced in the senescent brain. The simultaneous analysis of the concentrations of centrally acting drugs and the in vivo specific binding in the brain in relation to their pharmacokinetics may be valuable in evaluating their CNS effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10990204What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.