Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10986787›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique

Quality of breast cancer sites on the World Wide Web.

L Hoffman-Goetz, J N Clarke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Tangled in the breast cancer web: an evaluation of the usage of web-based information resources by breast cancer patients.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2013
    Article
  7. Online communities for breast cancer survivors: a review and analysis of their characteristics and levels of use.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A qualitative study of Canadian Aboriginal women's beliefs about "credible" cancer information on the internet.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2007
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Cancer patients' self-reported attitudes about the Internet.Journal of medical Internet research · 2005
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Cancer information on the world wide Web: gross characteristics.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2004
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Information and communication technology (ICT) in oncology. Patients' and relatives' experiences and suggestions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2003
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

L Hoffman-GoetzDepartment of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Ontario. lhgoetz@healthy.uwaterloo.ca
J N Clarke

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet is a powerful tool for accessing information about complex health topics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate breast cancer Internet sites using published criteria about website structure. Two searches were undertaken (November 1998 and June 1999) using the Yahoo search engine, providing a sample of 136 unique addresses. The results showed 1) owner's credentials were identified in 31.6% of sites, 2) financial charges were stated in 10.3% of sites, 3) less than 14.0% identified site creation date, 4) 33.1% identified content posting update, 5) 30.1% identified information sources, and 6) just under 88% of sites provided e-mail interactivity. The results indicate variability in breast cancer Internet sites with respect to framework criteria of accountability. We suggest that websites that lack fundamental indicators (such as dating and sources) do not provide the user with fundamental information that could enable informed decision making about site quality.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansInformation ServicesInternetPatient Education as TopicPeer Review, Health CareQuality ControlSocial Responsibility

Identifiers

PMID10986787
PMCPMC6979993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.