Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10984873›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2000

Medical markup language (MML) for XML-based hospital information interchange.

K Araki, K Ohashi, S Yamazaki, Y Hirose, Y Yamashita, R Yamamoto, K Minagawa, N Sakamoto, H Yoshihara

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

K ArakiMiyazaki Medical College Hospital, Japan.
K Ohashi
S Yamazaki
Y Hirose
Y Yamashita
R Yamamoto
K Minagawa
N Sakamoto
H Yoshihara

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical Markup Language (MML) has been developed over the last 6 years in order to create a set of standards by which medical data, within Japan and hopefully worldwide, can be stored, accessed and exchanged in any number of physical locates. The MML version 2.21 is characterized by XML as meta-language, module structure for each document and enhancement of linking function among documents. Data exchange specification has been also added for query and reply. MML instances are composed of MML header and MML body. The MML header includes information for data transmission, while MML body includes several module items. One module item contains two elements: document information and module content. Nine MML module contents are defined at the present time: patient information, health insurance information, diagnosis information, lifestyle information, basic clinic information, particular information at the time of first visit, progress course information, surgery record information and clinical summary information.

Indexed as

Hospital Information SystemsUnified Medical Language SystemClinical Laboratory TechniquesDatabase Management SystemsDiagnosisHumansHypermediaInformation Storage and RetrievalInsurance, HealthJapanLife StyleMedical Record LinkageMedical Records Systems, ComputerizedSurgical Procedures, OperativeSystems Integration

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.