ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2000
Rapid generation of nested chromosomal deletions on mouse chromosome 2.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Creating a "hopeful monster": mouse forward genetic screens.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2011Article
- A p53-dependent mechanism underlies macrocytic anemia in a mouse model of human 5q- syndrome.Nature medicine · 2010Article
- Effect of divergence time and recombination rate on molecular evolution of Drosophila INE-1 transposable elements and other candidates for neutrally evolving sites.Journal of molecular evolution · 2007Article
- Modeling chromosomes in mouse to explore the function of genes, genomic disorders, and chromosomal organization.PLoS genetics · 2006Review
- X-ray-induced deletion complexes in embryonic stem cells on mouse chromosome 15.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2005Article
- Development of an enhanced GFP-based dual-color reporter to facilitate genetic screens for the recovery of mutations in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2003Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nested chromosomal deletions are powerful genetic tools. They are particularly suited for identifying essential genes in development either directly or by screening induced mutations against a deletion. To apply this approach to the functional analysis of mouse chromosome 2, a strategy for the rapid generation of nested deletions with Cre recombinase was developed and tested. A loxP site was targeted to the Notch1 gene on chromosome 2. A targeted line was cotransfected with a second loxP site and a plasmid for transient expression of Cre. Independent random integrations of the second loxP site onto the targeted chromosome in direct repeat orientation created multiple nested deletions. By virtue of targeting in an F(1) hybrid embryonic stem cell line, F(1)(129S1xCast/Ei), the deletions could be verified and rapidly mapped. Ten deletions fell into seven size classes, with the largest extending six or seven centiMorgans. The cytology of the deletion chromosomes were determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Eight deletions were cytologically normal, but the two largest deletions had additional rearrangements. Three deletions, including the largest unrearranged deletion, have been transmitted through the germ line. Several endpoints also have been cloned by plasmid rescue. These experiments illustrate the means to rapidly create and map deletions anywhere in the mouse genome. They also demonstrate an improved method for generating nested deletions in embryonic stem cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.