Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10984537›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2000

A model for individual and collective cell movement in Dictyostelium discoideum.

E Palsson, H G Othmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Emergent collective behavior of cohesive, aligning particles.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Open problems in synthetic multicellularity.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Migration and division in cell monolayers on substrates with topological defects.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Mathematical models for cell migration: a non-local perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Physical models of collective cell motility: from cell to tissue.Journal of physics D: Applied physics · 2017
    Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

E PalssonDepartment of Biology, City University of New York, Staten Island, NY 10314, USA.
H G Othmer

Funding

DYNAMIC PATTERN IN CHEMICALLY-REACTING SYSTEMSR01GM029123 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI OTHMER, HANS G · 1985 to 2018
$5.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM 29123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum is a widely used model system for studying a variety of basic processes in development, including cell-cell signaling, signal transduction, pattern formation, cell motility, and the movement of tissue-like aggregates of cells. Many aspects of cell motion are poorly understood, including how individual cell behavior produces the collective motion of cells observed within the mound and slug. Herein, we describe a biologically realistic model for motile D. discoideum cells that can generate active forces, that interact via surface molecules, and that can detect and respond to chemotactic signals. We model the cells as deformable viscoelastic ellipsoids and incorporate signal transduction and cell-cell signaling by using a previously developed model. The shape constraint restricts the admissible deformations but makes the simulation of a large number of interacting cells feasible. Because the model is based on known processes, the parameters can be estimated or measured experimentally. We show that this model can reproduce the observations on the chemotactic behavior of single cells, streaming during aggregation, and the collective motion of an aggregate of cells driven by a small group of pacemakers. The model predicts that the motion of two-dimensional slugs [Bonner, J. T. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 9355-9359] results from the same behaviors that are exhibited by individual cells; it is not necessary to invoke different mechanisms or behaviors. Our computational experiments also suggest previously uncharacterized phenomena that may be experimentally observable.

Indexed as

Cell MovementAnimalsCyclic AMPDictyosteliumModels, BiologicalCyclic AMP

Identifiers

PMID10984537
PMCPMC27044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.