Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10983732›Full record

ReviewDrugs2000

Viral vectors for gene transfer: a review of their use in the treatment of human diseases.

W Walther, U Stein

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 436 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Installation of dominant-negative mutations inMolecular therapy. Oncology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Installation of Dominant-Negative Mutations inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery Systems to Enhance Gene Editing Efficiency.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Gene therapy: an alternative to treat Alzheimer's disease.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W WaltherMax-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany. wowalt@mdc-berlin.de
U Stein
Max Delbrück Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficient delivery of therapeutic genes and appropriate gene expression are the crucial issues for clinically relevant gene therapy. Viruses are naturally evolved vehicles which efficiently transfer their genes into host cells. This ability made them desirable for engineering virus vector systems for the delivery of therapeutic genes. The viral vectors recently in laboratory and clinical use are based on RNA and DNA viruses processing very different genomic structures and host ranges. Particular viruses have been selected as gene delivery vehicles because of their capacities to carry foreign genes and their ability to efficiently deliver these genes associated with efficient gene expression. These are the major reasons why viral vectors derived from retroviruses, adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, herpesvirus and poxvirus are employed in more than 70% of clinical gene therapy trials worldwide. Among these vector systems, retrovirus vectors represent the most prominent delivery system, since these vectors have high gene transfer efficiency and mediate high expression of therapeutic genes. Members of the DNA virus family such as adenovirus-, adeno-associated virus or herpesvirus have also become attractive for efficient gene delivery as reflected by the fast growing number of clinical trials using these vectors. The first clinical trials were designed to test the feasibility and safety of viral vectors. Numerous viral vector systems have been developed for ex vivo and in vivo applications. More recently, increasing efforts have been made to improve infectivity, viral targeting, cell type specific expression and the duration of expression. These features are essential for higher efficacy and safety of RNA- and DNA-virus vectors. From the beginning of development and utilisation of viral vectors it was apparent that they harbour risks such as toxicities, immunoresponses towards viral antigens or potential viral recombination, which limit their clinical use. However, many achievements have been made in vector safety, the retargeting of virus vectors and improving the expression properties by refining vector design and virus production. This review addresses important issues of the current status of viral vector design and discusses their key features as delivery systems in gene therapy of human inherited and acquired diseases at the level of laboratory developments and of clinical applications.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesAdenoviridaeDependovirusDNA VirusesHerpesvirus 1, HumanHumansLentivirusRetroviridaeTerminal Repeat SequencesVaccinia virus

Identifiers

PMID10983732
OpenAlexW2110921202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.