Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10983196›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2000

Large-scale hormone replacement therapy and life expectancy: results from an international comparison among European and North American populations.

S Panico, R Galasso, E Celentano, A V Ciardullo, L Frova, R Capocaccia, M Trevisan, F Berrino

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The risk of bias from omitted research.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2000
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

S PanicoDipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Federico II University, Naples, Italy. spanico@unina.it
R Galasso
E Celentano
A V Ciardullo
L Frova
R Capocaccia
M Trevisan
F Berrino

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAn analysis was performed to determine the risks and benefits of a 10-year hormone replacement therapy regimen that had been applied to all women at 50 years of age in 8 countries.

methodsCumulative mortality with and without hormone replacement therapy over 20 years was estimated, with both current and predicted total and disease-specific secular mortality trends and the influence of a generational cohort effect taken into account.

resultsIn countries with high ischemic heart disease frequency and predictable relative predominance of ischemic heart disease rates over breast cancer rates for the next 20 years, hormone replacement therapy could result in benefits with regard to overall mortality; this advantage decreases in younger-generation cohorts. In countries in which breast cancer mortality predominates over ischemic heart disease in early postmenopause and in which the predictable trends for both diseases reinforce this condition, a negative effect on overall mortality would be observed. In the United States, the effect of large-scale hormone replacement therapy would change over time.

conclusionsThe long-term effect of hormone replacement therapy on life expectancy of postmenopausal women may vary among countries.

Indexed as

Life ExpectancyAgedAge DistributionBreast NeoplasmsCause of DeathCohort EffectCoronary DiseaseEstrogen Replacement TherapyEuropeFemaleForecastingHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedNorth AmericaPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID10983196
PMCPMC1447610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.