ArticleMolecular and cellular biology2000
Roles of transcription factor Mot3 and chromatin in repression of the hypoxic gene ANB1 in yeast.
Article in Molecular and cellular biology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interactions between the transcription factors FfmA and AtrR are required to properly regulate gene expression in the fungus Aspergillus fumigatus.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2023Article
- Transcription factor FfmA interacts both physically and genetically with AtrR to properly regulate gene expression in the fungusbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Role of eIF5A in Mitochondrial Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Yeast Translation Elongation Factor eIF5A Expression Is Regulated by Nutrient Availability through Different Signalling Pathways.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- A D53 repression motif induces oligomerization of TOPLESS corepressors and promotes assembly of a corepressor-nucleosome complex.Science advances · 2017Article
- Identification of novel motif patterns to decipher the promoter architecture of co-expressed genes in Arabidopsis thaliana.BMC systems biology · 2013Article
- Activator and repressor functions of the Mot3 transcription factor in the osmostress response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Eukaryotic cell · 2013Article
- Shields up: the Tup1-Cyc8 repressor complex blocks coactivator recruitment.Genes & development · 2011Article
- Tup1 stabilizes promoter nucleosome positioning and occupancy at transcriptionally plastic genes.Nucleic acids research · 2011Article
- Metabolic changes through hypoxia in humans and in yeast as a comparable cell model.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2010Review
- Corepressor-directed preacetylation of histone H3 in promoter chromatin primes rapid transcriptional switching of cell-type-specific genes in yeast.Molecular and cellular biology · 2010Article
- Gene responses to oxygen availability in Kluyveromyces lactis: an insight on the evolution of the oxygen-responding system in yeast.PloS one · 2009Article
- Tritium suicide selection identifies proteins involved in the uptake and intracellular transport of sterols in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Eukaryotic cell · 2009Article
- Oxygen-dependent transcriptional regulator Hap1p limits glucose uptake by repressing the expression of the major glucose transporter gene RAG1 in Kluyveromyces lactis.Eukaryotic cell · 2008Article
- DNA sequence- and conformation-directed positioning of nucleosomes by chromatin-remodeling complexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2007Article
- Direct role for the Rpd3 complex in transcriptional induction of the anaerobic DAN/TIR genes in yeast.Molecular and cellular biology · 2007Article
- NoRC-dependent nucleosome positioning silences rRNA genes.The EMBO journal · 2006Article
- Synergy among differentially regulated repressors of the ribonucleotide diphosphate reductase genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Eukaryotic cell · 2006Article
- Genomewide identification of Sko1 target promoters reveals a regulatory network that operates in response to osmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Eukaryotic cell · 2005Article
- Combinatorial repression of the hypoxic genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by DNA binding proteins Rox1 and Mot3.Eukaryotic cell · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The hypoxic genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are repressed by a complex consisting of the aerobically expressed, sequence-specific DNA-binding protein Rox1 and the Tup1-Ssn6 general repressors. The regulatory region of one well-studied hypoxic gene, ANB1, is comprised of two operators, OpA and OpB, each of which has two strong Rox1 binding sites, yet OpA represses transcription almost 10 times more effectively than OpB. We show here that this difference is due to the presence of a Mot3 binding site in OpA. Mutations in this site reduced OpA repression to OpB levels, and the addition of a Mot3 binding site to OpB enhanced repression. Deletion of the mot3 gene also resulted in reduced repression of ANB1. Repression of two other hypoxic genes in which Mot3 sites were associated with Rox1 sites was reduced in the deletion strain, but other hypoxic genes were unaffected. In addition, the mot3Delta mutation caused a partial derepression of the Mig1-Tup1-Ssn6-repressed SUC2 gene, but not the alpha2-Mcm1-Tup1-Ssn6-repressed STE2 gene. The Mot3 protein was demonstrated to bind to the ANB1 OpA in vitro. Competition experiments indicated that there was no interaction between Rox1 and Mot3, indicating that Mot3 functions either in Tup1-Ssn6 recruitment or directly in repression. A great deal of evidence has accumulated suggesting that the Tup1-Ssn6 complex represses transcription through both nucleosome positioning and a direct interaction with the basal transcriptional machinery. We demonstrate here that under repressed conditions a nucleosome is positioned over the TATA box in the wild-type ANB1 promoter. This nucleosome was absent in cells carrying a rox1, tup1, or mot3 deletion, all of which cause some degree of derepression. Interestingly, however, this positioned nucleosome was also lost in a cell carrying a deletion of the N-terminal coding region of histone H4, yet ANB1 expression remained fully repressed. A similar deletion in the gene for histone H3, which had no effect on repression, had only a minor effect on the positioned nucleosome. These results indicate that the nucleosome phasing on the ANB1 promoter caused by the Rox1-Mot3-Tup1-Ssn6 complex is either completely redundant with a chromatin-independent repression mechanism or, less likely, plays no role in repression at all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.