Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10982397›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2000

Dynamics of transitional endoplasmic reticulum sites in vertebrate cells.

A T Hammond, B S Glick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 126 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 289 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Organizing principles underlying COPII-mediated transport.Current opinion in cell biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A T HammondDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
B S Glick
University of Chicago · US

Funding

PHS HHS 5-20942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A typical vertebrate cell contains several hundred sites of transitional ER (tER). Presumably, tER sites generate elements of the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment (ERGIC), and ERGIC elements then generate Golgi cisternae. Therefore, characterizing the mechanisms that influence tER distribution may shed light on the dynamic behavior of the Golgi. We explored the properties of tER sites using Sec13 as a marker protein. Fluorescence microscopy confirmed that tER sites are long-lived ER subdomains. tER sites proliferate during interphase but lose Sec13 during mitosis. Unlike ERGIC elements, tER sites move very little. Nevertheless, when microtubules are depolymerized with nocodazole, tER sites redistribute rapidly to form clusters next to Golgi structures. Hence, tER sites have the unusual property of being immobile, yet dynamic. These findings can be explained by a model in which new tER sites are created by retrograde membrane traffic from the Golgi. We propose that the tER-Golgi system is organized by mutual feedback between these two compartments.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCell DivisionCHO CellsCricetinaeEndoplasmic ReticulumFeedbackGolgi ApparatusGolgi Matrix ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHeLa CellsHumansLuminescent ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMicroscopy, FluorescenceMicroscopy, VideoGolgi Matrix ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsmacrogolginMembrane ProteinsNocodazoleNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSEC13 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID10982397
PMCPMC14972
OpenAlexW2129177835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.