Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10981157›Full record

ArticleCurrent hypertension reports2000

The influence of national guidelines on antihypertensive prescribing patterns.

D Siegel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current hypertension reports, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

D SiegelMedical Service (III), Department of Veterans Affairs NCHCS, 10535 Hospital Way, Mather, CA 95655, USA. siegel.david@martinez.va.gov

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efforts to influence medical practice include the formation of expert medical panels who make recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of clinical problems. Despite the considerable expense and effort that go into these activities, it is unclear whether they are successful. Recent studies have evaluated whether recommendations from the Fifth Joint National Committee on the Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V) published in 1993 influenced antihypertensive prescribing patterns. These included a national study of medications dispensed by retail pharmacies and an evaluation of antihypertensive prescribing patterns in US Veterans Affairs (VA) medical facilities. Despite recommendations from JNC V that hydrochlorothiazide and beta-blockers be used as first choice for most hypertensive patients, calcium antagonists and angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors were the most common drugs prescribed for hypertension in both 1992 (before JNC V) and 1995 (after JNC V). In retail pharmacies, changes in antihypertensive drug dispensing patterns from 1992 to 1995 reflected increased use of calcium antagonists and ACE inhibitors and decreased use of diuretics and beta-blockers, suggesting that JNC V recommendations had little effect on prescribing patterns. Similar patterns of antihypertensive drug use were found in VA facilities. The reasons for the lack of influence of JNC V recommendations on antihypertensive prescribing patterns must be explored and alternative ways of educating health care providers implemented.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersDiureticsDrug CostsDrug PrescriptionsDrug UtilizationEducation, MedicalHospitals, VeteransHumansHydrochlorothiazidePharmaciesSodium Chloride Symporter InhibitorsAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersDiureticsHydrochlorothiazideSodium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.