Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10981095›Full record

ArticleCurrent hypertension reports1999

Clinical trials in isolated systolic hypertension.

J Gasowski, J G Wang, J A Staessen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current hypertension reports, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J GasowskiStudiecoördinatiecentrum, Laboratorium Hypertensie, Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.
J G Wang
J A Staessen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isolated systolic hypertension affects 8% to 15% of all people older than 60 years of age. In the elderly, systolic hypertension is the major modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. Three placebo-controlled outcome trials on antihypertensive drug treatment of this disorder have been published. This article briefly reviews the main findings of each of these three trials and presents pooled estimates of the benefit of antihypertensive drug treatment for elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension. A total of 11, 825 patients were enrolled in the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP, n = 4736), the Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur, n = 4695), and the Systolic Hypertension in China (Syst-China, n = 2394) trials. The outcome results of these trials were pooled by calculating the common odds ratio for active versus placebo treatment. The pooled results of the outcome trials in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension prove that antihypertensive drug treatment must be prescribed if, on repeated measurement, systolic blood pressure is 160 mm Hg or higher.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureChinaEuropeHumansHypertensionOdds RatioSystoleTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.