Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10981087›Full record

ArticleCurrent hypertension reports1999

The Hypertension Optimal Treatment Study: what did it give us?

R J Bryg, W F Graettinger

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current hypertension reports, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

R J BrygDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Nevada School of Medicine, and Ioannis A. Lougaris VA Medical Center (III), 1000 Locust Street, Reno, NV 89520 USA.
W F Graettinger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Hypertension Optimal Treatment study was a large, randomized, multicenter study to determine the answers to two questions: 1) what is the optimal target blood pressure to be sought in the treatment of patients with moderate hypertension? and 2) does low dose aspirin therapy decrease morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension? After 3.8 years of follow-up for the almost 19,000 patients, the following conclusions from the study could be ascertained 1) lowering diastolic blood pressure in patients with diabetes to levels below 80 mm Hg decreases the risk of major cardiovascular events and cardiovascular mortality compared with lowering it to "normal" (< 90 mm Hg) levels. It may lower total mortality, but this study was not powered for this end point; 2) aspirin therapy, in patients with hypertension, is safe and decreases major cardiovascular events and acute myocardial infarction; 3) there does not appear to be an additional effect on cardiovascular mortality or overall mortality below that observed with a reduction of diastolic blood pressure to less than 90 mm Hg for the population as a whole; and 4) the lowest cardiovascular event rate for the population as a whole was achieved at a diastolic blood pressure of 83 mm Hg. Several limitations to this study exist, including the low event rate achieved and the generalizability of this study to the average nondiabetic patient with hypertension seen in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AgedAspirinBlood PressureDiabetic AngiopathiesFibrinolytic AgentsHumansHypertensionMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicMyocardial InfarctionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignStrokeAspirinFibrinolytic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.