ReviewCurrent hypertension reports
Linkage mapping for hypertension susceptibility genes.
Review in Current hypertension reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The discovery of hypertension: evolving views on the role of the kidneys, and current hot topics.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2015Review
- Genetic determinants of hypertension: an update.Current hypertension reports · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several approaches based on linkage methods have been used to identify susceptibility genes for hypertension. Tests of candidate genes for essential hypertension have generally relied on the combination of linkage and association studies, and have given mostly negative or relatively conflicting results between studies. The detailed exploration of a candidate region, eg, a region of human homology to a principal quantitative trait locus for blood pressure variation in the rat, has led to the identification of linkage to a susceptibility locus for hypertension in humans. Studies of rare Mendelian forms of hypertension have enabled us to identify causative genes in several instances, and to detect mere linkages to chromosomal regions in other instances. Whether molecular variants at these genes are pathophysiologically involved in the common form of hypertension remains to be established. Finally, genome-wide linkage studies for essential hypertension are currently in progress. Confirming linkage to particular regions or genes with a high statistical significance in essential hypertension may prove difficult, therefore, other lines of evidence for a particular gene's role in hypertension susceptibility, derived from either studies in animal models, studies of Mendelian forms of hypertension, or from association studies, may prove to be crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10981038What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.