Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10980942›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports1999

Update on diagnosis and management of chronic pancreatitis.

P P Toskes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 1999. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advances in MRI of Chronic Pancreatitis.Advances in clinical radiology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Diagnosis and management of chronic pancreatitis.Postgraduate medical journal · 2005
    Review
  8. Medical therapy for chronic pancreatitis pain.Current gastroenterology reports · 2003
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

P P ToskesDepartment of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Box 100277, JHMHC, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
University of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pancreatitis should be considered in all patients with unexplained abdominal pain. The importance of small duct disease without obvious radiographic abnormalities is an important new concept. It is meaningful for the clinician to define whether the patient with chronic pancreatitis has small duct or large duct disease. Diagnostic evaluations should begin with a simple, noninvasive, inexpensive test such as serum trypsinogen, to be followed by more complicated testing such as the secretin stimulation test, particularly in those patients with small duct disease. Non-enteric-coated pancreatic enzyme preparations are preferred for the treatment of pain whereas enteric-coated pancreatic enzyme preparations are the drugs of choice for treating steatorrhea. Octreotide may become an important therapy for treating abdominal pain unresponsive to pancreatic enzyme therapy. Endoscopic treatment of the pain of chronic pancreatitis should be used only in highly selected patients and may cause damage to the pancreas. Surgical ductal decompression is appropriate in selected patients.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeChronic DiseaseDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansPancreatic Function TestsPancreatitisTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID10980942
OpenAlexW2020770143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.