Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10978298›Full record

ArticleGenetics2000

Evolutionary dynamics of self-incompatibility alleles in Brassica.

M K Uyenoyama

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The different mechanisms of sporophytic self-incompatibility.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2003
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M K UyenoyamaDepartment of Zoology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0325, USA. marcy@duke.edu

Funding

NIGMS NIH HHS GM 27841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-incompatibility in Brassica entails the rejection of pollen grains that express specificities held in common with the seed parent. In Brassica, pollen specificity is encoded at the multipartite S-locus, a complex region comprising many expressed genes. A number of species within the Brassicaceae express sporophytic self-incompatibility, under which individual pollen grains bear specificities determined by one or both S-haplotypes of the pollen parent. Classical genetic and nucleotide-level analyses of the S-locus have revealed a dichotomy in sequence and function among S-haplotypes; in particular, all class I haplotypes show dominance over all class II haplotypes in determination of pollen specificity. Analysis of an evolutionary model that explicitly incorporates features of the Brassica system, including the class dichotomy, indicates that class II haplotypes may invade populations at lower rates and decline to extinction at higher rates than class I haplotypes. This analysis suggests convergence to an evolutionarily persistent state characterized by the maintenance in high frequency of a single class II haplotype together with many class I haplotypes, each in low frequency. This expectation appears to be consistent with empirical observations of high frequencies of relatively few distinct recessive haplotypes.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAllelesBrassicaGenes, PlantHaplotypesModels, GeneticPollenSeedsSelection, GeneticStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID10978298
PMCPMC1461253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.