Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10978226›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2000

Screening for genomic rearrangements in families with breast and ovarian cancer identifies BRCA1 mutations previously missed by conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis or sequencing.

M A Unger, K L Nathanson, K Calzone, D Antin-Ozerkis, H A Shih, A M Martin, G M Lenoir, S Mazoyer, B L Weber

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 158 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Functional assays for BRCA1 and BRCA2.The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology · 2007
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

M A UngerDepartment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
K L Nathanson
K Calzone
D Antin-Ozerkis
H A Shih
A M Martin
G M Lenoir
S Mazoyer
B L Weber
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FR

Funding

Human and Murine Models of BRCA1 TumorigenesisR01CA076417 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI O'MALLEY, BERT W · 1998 to 2007
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA076417NCI NIH HHS R01CA76417-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The frequency of genomic rearrangements in BRCA1 was assessed in 42 American families with breast and ovarian cancer who were seeking genetic testing and who were subsequently found to be negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 coding-region mutations. An affected individual from each family was tested by PCR for the exon 13 duplication (Puget et al. 1999a) and by Southern blot analysis for novel genomic rearrangements. The exon 13 duplication was detected in one family, and four families had other genomic rearrangements. A total of 5 (11. 9%) of the 42 families with breast/ovarian cancer who did not have BRCA1 and BRCA2 coding-region mutations had mutations in BRCA1 that were missed by conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis or sequencing. Four of five families with BRCA1 genomic rearrangements included at least one individual with both breast and ovarian cancer; therefore, 4 (30.8%) of 13 families with a case of multiple primary breast and ovarian cancer had a genomic rearrangement in BRCA1. Families with genomic rearrangements had prior probabilities of having a BRCA1 mutation, ranging from 33% to 97% (mean 70%) (Couch et al. 1997). In contrast, in families without rearrangements, prior probabilities of having a BRCA1 mutation ranged from 7% to 92% (mean 37%). Thus, the prior probability of detecting a BRCA1 mutation may be a useful predictor when considering the use of Southern blot analysis for families with breast/ovarian cancer who do not have detectable coding-region mutations.

Indexed as

Blotting, SouthernBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesDNA Mutational AnalysisEthnicityEuropeExonsFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleGene DosageGene RearrangementGenes, BRCA1Genes, DuplicateGenetic TestingHumansBRCA2 ProteinNeoplasm ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID10978226
PMCPMC1287889
OpenAlexW2061071119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.