ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2000
Evidence based health policy report. Screening for genital chlamydial infection.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection among Saudi women attending the infertility clinic in Central Saudi Arabia.Saudi medical journal · 2015Article
- Chlamydia screening in England: a qualitative study of the narrative behind the policy.BMC public health · 2012Article
- Prevalence and associated factors for Chlamydia trachomatis infection among undocumented immigrants in a primary care facility in Geneva, Switzerland: a cross-sectional study.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2010Article
- Case-control study of self reported genitourinary infections and risk of gastroschisis: findings from the national birth defects prevention study, 1997-2003.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2008Article
- Screening programmes for chlamydial infection: when will we ever learn?BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007Review
- Young, male, and infected: the forgotten victims of chlamydia in primary care.Sexually transmitted infections · 2005Article
- Chlamydia trachomatis in female sex workers in Belgium: 1998-2003.Sexually transmitted infections · 2005Article
- Screening for Chlamydia and gonorrhea by strand displacement amplification in homeless adolescents attending youth shelters in Korea.Journal of Korean medical science · 2004Article
- Chlamydial infection: an accurate model for opportunistic screening in general practice.Sexually transmitted infections · 2003Article
- Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in early pregnancy using self-administered vaginal swabs and first pass urines: a cross-sectional community-based survey.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2002Article
- The diagnosis of chlamydia, gonorrhoea, and trichomonas infections by self obtained low vaginal swabs, in remote northern Australian clinical practice.Sexually transmitted infections · 2002Article
- The national strategy for sexual health and HIV: implications for genitourinary medicine.Sexually transmitted infections · 2002Review
- Recent advances: Sexually transmitted infections.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Review
- Evidence is not (yet) enough for evidence based policy for chlamydia screening.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2001Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.