Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10977398›Full record

Trial reportPharmacoEconomics2000

Cost effectiveness of zanamivir for the treatment of influenza in a high risk population in Australia.

J A Mauskopf, S C Cates, A D Griffin, D M Neighbors, S C Lamb, C Rutherford

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in PharmacoEconomics, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
19.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccination of children in Germany.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J A MauskopfResearch Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA. jom@rti.org
S C Cates
A D Griffin
D M Neighbors
S C Lamb
C Rutherford
RTI International · USWellcome Library · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo use data from a clinical trial of zanamivir, a new antiviral drug, to estimate the costs and effectiveness of alternative treatment strategies for a high-risk population in Australia visiting a physician for treatment of influenza or influenza-like illness within 36 hours of symptom onset. DESIGN AND

settingThis was a modelling study using data from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with centres in Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. Cost data were taken from standard Australian sources.

methodsEfficacy data from the clinical trial were used to populate a computer model designed to estimate the costs and health outcomes associated with alternative treatments for influenza and influenza-like illness. Only patients who consulted the physician within 36 hours of symptom onset were included in this trial. Cost data were used to translate the clinical data into treatment cost estimates.

resultsTreatment with zanamivir for this high risk population results in an incremental cost of $A14.20 per day of symptoms avoided in the base case. The cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained is $A11,715. The results are sensitive to several parameter values, including the influenza-positive rate and the impact of zanamivir on days to alleviate symptoms and hospitalisation.

conclusionsInfluenza is costly for the high risk population who seek physician treatment. Treatment with zanamivir for this population is cost effective based on an $A78,000 per QALY benchmark. Zanamivir could be cost saving if it reduces the hospitalisation rate.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisDouble-Blind MethodGuanidinesHealth Care CostsHumansInfluenza, HumanPyransSialic AcidsZanamivirAntiviral AgentsGuanidinesPyransSialic AcidsZanamivir

Identifiers

PMID10977398
OpenAlexW2039737448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.