Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10976415›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2000

FISH analysis of six chromosomes in unfertilized human oocytes after polar body removal.

E Martini, S P Flaherty, N J Swann, C D Matthews, F C Ramaekers, J P Geraedts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E MartiniDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands.
S P Flaherty
N J Swann
C D Matthews
F C Ramaekers
J P Geraedts

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop an improved technique for estimating chromosomal abnormalities in human oocytes by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and to correlate the position of single chromatids with the chromosomal status of the oocytes.

methodsOocytes that were at metaphase II about 17-20 hr after insemination or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were treated with pronase to remove the zona pellucida and polar body (PB) and then spread on slides using HCl and Tween 20. Two rounds of FISH were performed using direct-labeled probes: chromosomes 1, 13, 21 (round 1); chromosomes X, 7, 18 (round 2).

resultsOf the 63 oocytes from 18 patients (mean age, 32 years), 48 (76%) had one DNA complement as expected, 9 (14%) had 2 DNA complements, 3 (5%) gave incomplete FISH signals, and 3 (5%) were not analyzable. Of the 48 oocytes with one set of DNA, 48% were haploid, 44% were aneuploid for one or more chromosomes, and 8% were polyploid. We also found an increased frequency of predivision of chromatid bivalents in aneuploid oocytes, especially for chromosome 21.

conclusionsThis technique enables simultaneous assessment of six chromosomes in human oocytes, and therefore can be useful for accurately determining the incidence and causes of genetic imbalances in human oocytes and apparently low fertilization rates.

Indexed as

AneuploidyCell Nucleus StructuresAdultChromatidsDNADNA ProbesFemaleFertilizationHaploidyHumansIndolesIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceOocytesPolyploidyPronaseSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicDAPIDNADNA ProbesIndolesPronase

Identifiers

PMID10976415
PMCPMC3455197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.