ArticleCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne2000
When should hypertension be treated? The different perspectives of Canadian family physicians and patients.
Article in CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature.BMC health services research · 2008Pooled it
- Patient Preferences for Hypertension Treatment Outcomes: A Quantitative Field Study Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process.The patient · 2026Article
- Review
- Decision threshold models in medical decision making: a scoping literature review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Consensus-Based Development of an Assessment Tool: A Methodology for Patient Engagement in Primary Care and CPD Research.The Journal of continuing education in the health professions · 2022Article
- Patient Preferences for Attributes of Health Canada Approved Weight Loss Medications Among Adults Living with Obesity in Canada: A Qualitative Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
- A Systematic Review of Patient Preferences, Expectations, and Values for the Management and Treatment of Hypertension.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Review
- At Odds About the Odds: Women's Choices to Accept Osteoporosis Medications Do Not Closely Agree with Physician-Set Treatment Thresholds.Journal of general internal medicine · 2020Article
- Outcome preferences of older people with multiple chronic conditions and hypertension: a cross-sectional survey using best-worst scaling.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
- A study of target effect sizes in randomised controlled trials published in the Health Technology Assessment journal.Trials · 2018Article
- Article
- Getting (Along) With the Guidelines: Reconciling Patient Autonomy and Quality Improvement Through Shared Decision Making.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2016Article
- Immediate effects of upper thoracic spine manipulation on hypertensive individuals.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2015Article
- Article
- Patient perceptions of osteoporosis treatment thresholds.The Journal of rheumatology · 2014Article
- Should malaria treatment be guided by a point of care rapid test? A threshold approach to malaria management in rural Burkina Faso.PloS one · 2013Article
- Is it possible to estimate the minimal clinically important treatment effect needed to change practice in preterm birth prevention? Results of an obstetrician survey used to support the design of a trial.BMC medical research methodology · 2012Article
- The "number needed to treat" turns 20--and continues to be used and misused.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypertension guidelines from different organizations often specify different treatment thresholds, and none explicitly state how these thresholds were chosen. This study was undertaken to determine the treatment thresholds of family physicians and hypertensive patients for mild, uncomplicated essential hypertension. A subject's treatment threshold can be determined by eliciting the minimum reduction in cardiovascular risk that he or she feels outweighs the inconvenience, costs and side effects of antihypertensive therapy (the minimal clinically important difference [MCID]).
methodsThe study subjects consisted of a random sample of family physicians and a consecutive sample of hypertensive patients without overt cardiovascular disease from Ottawa and Edmonton. To determine participants' MCIDs, we used a survey employing hypothetical scenarios (each depicting a different baseline cardiovascular risk) and a probability trade-off tool.
resultsOf 94 family physicians and 146 patients approached for the study, 72 and 74 participated respectively. There was marked variability in the MCIDs of both groups. In general, patients were less likely to want antihypertensive therapy than physicians, particularly when baseline cardiovascular risks were low: 49% v. 64% (p = 0.06), 68% v. 92% (p < 0.001) and 86% v. 100% (p = 0.001) for 5-year cardiovascular risks of 2%, 5% and 10% respectively. Moreover, patients expressed larger MCIDs (i.e., wanted greater benefits before accepting therapy) than physicians. However, a subgroup of patients (15% to 26%, depending on the scenario) wanted treatment even if there was no anticipated benefit. Multivariate analysis showed that no sociodemographic factors strongly predicted the MCIDs of either group.
interpretationGuidelines that set treatment thresholds on the basis of physician or expert opinion may not accurately reflect the preferences of hypertensive patients. There is a need for patient decision aids and attention to patient preferences when initiation of antihypertensive therapy is considered for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Further research is needed to define treatment thresholds for other chronic conditions and in other groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
10976255PMC80373W1945374009What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.