Trial reportLancet (London, England)2000
Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT).
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02351973 (Comparison of Single and Combination Diuretics in Low-Renin Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 260 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Single and Combination Diuretics in Low-Renin Hypertension
Who cites it
260 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,205 citations in OpenAlex.
- Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of Calcium Channel Blockers versus Diuretics for Hypertension.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Pooled it
- Calcium channel blockers versus other classes of drugs for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Progression as Surrogate Marker for Cardiovascular Risk: Meta-Analysis of 119 Clinical Trials Involving 100 667 Patients.Circulation · 2020Pooled it
- First-line combination therapy versus first-line monotherapy for primary hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in adults aged 18 to 59 years.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- High-dose calcium channel blocker (CCB) monotherapy vs combination therapy of standard-dose CCBs and angiotensin receptor blockers for hypertension: a meta-analysis.Journal of human hypertension · 2017Pooled it
- First-line combination therapy versus first-line monotherapy for primary hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- 7th Brazilian Guideline of Arterial Hypertension: Chapter 7 - Pharmacological TreatmentArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2016Guideline
- Association of Thiazide-Type Diuretics With Glycemic Changes in Hypertensive Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Antihypertensive agents for preventing diabetic kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Long-acting dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers and sympathetic nervous system activity in hypertension: a literature review comparing amlodipine and nifedipine GITS.Blood pressure · 2012Pooled it
- JBS 2: Joint British Societies' guidelines on prevention of cardiovascular disease in clinical practice.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2005Guideline
- The role of calcium antagonists in stroke prevention.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2005Pooled it
- Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the fourth working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004-BHS IV.Journal of human hypertension · 2004Guideline
- Patient-profiled treatment responses in a large hypertension trial: a posthoc analysis of the INSIGHT study.Journal of hypertension · 2026Trial
- Evaluation of Aldosterone Suppression by Cinnarizine, a Putative Cav1.3 Inhibitor.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Trial
- Patiromer-Facilitated Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitor Utilization in Patients with Heart Failure with or without Comorbid Chronic Kidney Disease: Subgroup Analysis of DIAMOND Randomized Trial.American journal of nephrology · 2024Trial
- Trial
200 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe efficacy of antihypertensive drugs newer than diuretics and beta-blockers has not been established. We compared the effects of the calcium-channel blocker nifedipine once daily with the diuretic combination co-amilozide on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients with hypertension.
methodsWe did a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial in Europe and Israel in 6321 patients aged 55-80 years with hypertension (blood pressure > or = 150/95 mm Hg, or > or = 160 mm Hg systolic). Patients had at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor. We randomly assigned patients nifedipine 30 mg in a long-acting gastrointestinal-transport-system (GITS) formulation (n=3157), or co-amilozide (hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg [corrected] plus amiloride 2.5 mg; n=3164). Dose titration was by dose doubling, and addition of atenolol 25-50 mg or enalapril 5-10 mg. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, or stroke. Analysis was done by intention to treat.
findingsPrimary outcomes occurred in 200 (6.3%) patients in the nifedipine group and in 182 (5.8%) in the co-amilozide group (18.2 vs 16.5 events per 1000 patient-years; relative risk 1.10 [95% CI 0.91-1.34], p=0.35). Overall mean blood pressure fell from 173/99 mm Hg (SD 14/8) to 138/82 mm Hg (12/7). There was an 8% excess of withdrawals from the nifedipine group because of peripheral oedema (725 vs 518, p<0.0001), but serious adverse events were more frequent in the co-amilozide group (880 vs 796, p=0.02). Deaths were mainly non-vascular (nifedipine 176 vs co-amilozide 172; p=0.81). 80% of the primary events occurred in patients receiving randomised treatment (157 nifedipine, 147 co-amilozide, difference 0.33% [-0.7 to 1.4]).
interpretationNifedipine once daily and co-amilozide were equally effective in preventing overall cardiovascular or cerebrovascular complications. The choice of drug can be decided by tolerability and blood-pressure response rather than long-term safety or efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.