Evidence map›Paper›PMID 10972133›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2000

What is the function of receptor and membrane endocytosis at the postsynaptic neuron?

J Smythies

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Oxidative Stress and Its Clinical Applications in Dementia.Journal of neurodegenerative diseases · 2013
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J SmythiesCenter for Brain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0109, USA. smythies@psy.ucsd.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores the implications of certain new developments in cell biology upon neuroscience. Until recently it was thought that neurotransmitters and neuromodulators had only one function, which was to stimulate their specific receptors at the cell surface. From here on, all activity was supposed to be effected by postsynaptic cascades. The discovery that membrane components, particularly G-protein-linked receptors, are not static but are subject to a massive and complex process of continual endocytosis, processing in the endosome system and recycling back to the external membrane, raises the question of its functional significance. In addition, it has been found that many neuromodulators such as polypeptides have their main locus of action inside the postsynaptic neuron. This review covers the role of the endocytic mechanism on receptor desensitization and resensitization, synaptic reorganization and plasticity synaptic scaling and the possible repair of oxidative damage. The possible involvement of this system in Alzheimer's disease is discussed.

Indexed as

Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSynapsesAnimalsCell MembraneEndocytosisHumansNeuronsReceptors, Cell SurfaceGPR1 protein, S cerevisiaeReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID10972133
PMCPMC1690678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.