ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2000
Probing the human natural autoantibody repertoire using an immunoscreening approach.
Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2000. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibody evolution constrains conformational heterogeneity by tailoring protein dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006Article
- Protein dynamics and the immunological evolution of molecular recognition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While an increasing number of studies report the presence of antibodies capable of recognizing self-antigens, the function of these natural autoantibodies remains elusive. A variety of concepts has been advanced ranging from evolutionarily tolerated but non-functional natural autoantibodies to autoantibodies effecting various biological functions. Known IgM, IgG, and IgA natural autoantibodies are directed against various antigens, including nuclear and cell surface proteins. To explore further autoantibodies and their autoantigens, we employed an immunological screening method called SEREX recently used to characterize tumour-expressed antigens eliciting an immune response in patients [1]. Sera from 12 individuals were used to screen a cDNA expression library prepared from a cytogenetically normal meningioma to identify antigens reactive with normal human sera from individuals without obvious disease. Nineteen reactive normal antigen clones were identified representing 15 different antigens, including nine genes with known functions, five genes with unknown functions, and one gene with a novel sequence not present in the databases. Of the 12 individual normal sera tested, 75% were reactive to one or more of the 15 different antigens with two highly reactive sera demonstrating reactivity with 33% of the antigens. When screening the same meningioma expression library with serum from the patient, eight antigens were identified that were totally different from those identified using sera from normal individuals. This SEREX immunological screening method presents a new option for probing the natural autoantibody repertoire and identifying normal antigens whose functions may provide additional insights into how natural autoantibodies effect various biological functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.